............FEDERAL CIVIL PROCEDURE ONE
..............................PROBLEM #3 ----------
ISSUE ALL 4: WHERE CAN P LAY VENUE?
(this question applies to the following four scenarios)
![]()
......................................................................FfFILE:
..................................................................Scenario One:
| Plaintiff's residence | .....Nature of claim | Defendants' residence |
Diversity |
NY |
|
CA |
Transitory |
NY |
| ..IInjury: Wash., D.C. |
.................................................................Scenario Two:
| Plaintiff's residence | Nature of claim | Defendants' residence |
Diversity |
NY |
|
PA |
Transitory |
NJ |
| ..Injury: Toronto (Can.) |
...............................................................Scenario Three:
| Plaintiff's residence | Nature of claim | Defendants' residence |
Fed Question |
NY |
|
PA |
Transitory |
NJ |
| ..Injury: Toronto (Can.) |
.................................................................Scenario Four:
| Plaintiff's residence | Nature of claim | Defendant's residence |
Diversity |
||
CA |
Transitory |
NY corporation |
| ..Injury: Wash., D.C. |
......................................................PLEADING & MOTION
...........................................(fresh scenario unrelated to prior 4 cases)
Facts:
* Peter's claim against Dorothy arose outside of
Washington, D.C.--but within the US.
* Peter resides in Washington, D.C. [Remember that "resides"
& "domicile" are not necessarily
...synonymous.]
|
PETER PLAINTIFF ..................v. DOROTHY DEFENDANT and NUCORP, INC. |
................... COMPLAINT ....................for DAMAGES .... .........Southern District of New York ....................(28 USC §1332) |
|
.....1. This is a "case arising" under 28 USC §1332 (Diversity Jurisdiction). Peter is domiciled in California. Dorothy is domiciled in New York. NuCorp is a New York corporation. NuCorp's principal place of business is in Los Angeles, CA. .....2. [Charging allegations.] .....3. [Requisite amount in controversy plead in good faith against all defendants.] .................................................................................
Lawrence Lawyer, III |
|
|
PETER PLAINTIFF ..................v. DOROTHY DEFENDANT and NUCORP, INC. |
. MOTION
TO DISMISS COMPLAINT .........Southern District of New York ......................FRCP 12(b) |
|
.....Defendant Dorothy hereby moves
this court for an order dismissing Peter's complaint on the following
grounds * * * [all possible bases, based on course material
to date--and thus, a mini course review]. ................................................................................. Wild Bill McTavish ..................................................................................Last, Only & Chance ..................................................................................Attorneys for the Defendant |
|
More Facts/New Issue:
* Peter resides in Washington, D.C.
* We still do not know where the claim arose.
* There is nonfederal ("state") law applicable in Washington,
D.C. (Congress wears "two hats").
* Washington, D.C. is a "state" for purposes of fed
civ pro.
* Hypothetical legislation passed by the U.S. Congress for "state"
purposes in Washington, DC appears below.
* The general federal venue statute [28 USC 1391] no longer
includes a "plaintiff's residence" as it once did.
..That former
federal venue alternative was removed about a dozen years
ago from the general federal venue
...statute. (Does this suggest a
significant counterveiling federal interest, for choice of law
purposes?)
......................................................FILE (Litigation
Documents)
|
PETER PLAINTIFF ..................v. DOROTHY DEFENDANT |
. .......MOTION
TO TRANSFER .........Southern District of New York .................28 USC 1404(a)..... .... |
|
.....1.
Defendant Dorothy resides in New York. Peter resides in
Washington, DC. .................................................................................
Wild Bill McTavish |
|
|
..............................................................
STATUTES: ..........................................28 United States Code (Judicial Code) |
|
Issues:
Can the federal court in New York transfer this
case from where Dorothy resides to the
Washington, DC federal court? Should the judge who
is considering Dorothy's request for a
transfer to Washington, DC apply "state" (Wash.,
DC) or federal venue law? Is there a govderning
law issue related to D's venue transfer request?
![]()
Problem
Page
Course
Page