COURSE SYLLABUS
MHR 6690-HUMAN RESOURCE POLICY & STRATEGY
Professor Larry Siebers
COURSE DESCRIPTION
This is the "capstone" course in Human Resource Management. It is
designed to provide a strategic framework for integrating and applying the
concepts learned in the specialized classes.
COURSE OBJECTIVES
A. To create a learning environment wherein everyone in the class can learn from each other and test each other's thinking.
B. To apply critical thinking skills to a variety of advanced HR issues.
C. To run a Human Resource Department so as to meet the most critical needs
of the organization while operating within a predetermined budget.
STUDY MATERIALS
READING PACKET: Cases and articles included with this syllabus
HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SIMULATION: by Jerald Smith and
Peggy Golden
OFFICE INFORMATION
Office: Room 408, Business School
Office Phone: 435-797-2301
Office Fax: 435-797-1091
E-mail: lsiebers@b202.usu.edu
Office Hours: 1:00 PM to 5:00 PM Monday through Wednesday
INSTUCTOR
Larry Siebers, Ph.D. is Executive-in-Residence
with Utah State University. Previous experience includes positions as Sr. Vice
president, Human Resources for Southeast Bank; Vice President, Personnel for
Eastern Airlines; Vice President, Personnel & Organization for
International Harvester Co.; and Staff psychologist for United Airlines. He
holds a Ph.D. in Industrial Psychology from Illinois Institute of Technology
and MS and BS degrees in Psychology from the University of Utah.
COURSE FORMAT
The course will focus primarily upon the application of knowledge acquired
in the various HR specialty courses plus an expansion of this knowledge. The
course will be comprised of three elements. These elements will be 1) lectures
to give a strategic perspective on HR issues, 2) the analysis of what companies
have done in meeting HR needs, and 3) the hands on experience of running an HR
department through a computer simulation.
CASES
There are ten cases included in this syllabus. They are primarily Harvard
Business School cases. You will find that these cases are longer and more
complex than those you have previously experienced are. It is important that
you carefully read and prepare these cases so you can actively participate in
the case discussion. The cases take more than one reading. You should highlight
key issues and facts, make marginal or separate notes, and formulate your own
conclusions. Some cases may require the solving of a problem or problems. Other
cases simply describe what is going on in a company at a particular time. In
these cases, you want to determine the appropriateness of the company's actions
and how what you have learned applies to these actions.
You should select five of these ten cases for a more formal analysis.
Prepare a typed executive summary (about 2 pages) for each of the five selected
cases. Submit the executive summary via FAX or e-mail to my office on the
Monday proceeding the Wednesday upon which we will discuss the case. Those who
submit an executive summary for a particular case will be expected to take the
lead in the discussion of this case. The executive summary will be graded as I)
incomplete, S) satisfactory, or E) excellent. The sum of the grades, on a 6
point scale, received on the five summaries will determine your grade for case
preparation.
COMPUTER SIMULATION
Computer simulation teams will be formed consisting of from 2 to 4 people.
The objective of this simulation is to give you experience in managing a human
resource department. You will have to make quarterly decisions about actions
you should take and programs that you should initiate while operating within
you budget and dealing with various labor market constraints. You will be
required to submit the following (each should be typed):
1. Year 1 and Year 2 Business Plans-see guidelines on page 5 of this syllabus
2. Year 1 Management Audit - see page 8 of this syllabus
3. Final report and presentation - see instructions below
Each team at the conclusion of the simulation will make a presentation. This
presentation should be no longer than 10 minutes in length. It should be done
in a Power-point format. The written report and presentation should address
three questions which are 1) what did we do (mission, values, strategy and
goals), 2) what did we achieve (% improvement for each goal area from year 1
starting value), and 3) what did we learn. For the presentation use appropriate
charts and/or graphs to present and support your findings.
GRADES
|
Grading Categories |
Percent of Grade |
|
HR simulation (Group grade) |
|
|
1. Year 1 HR Plan |
5 |
|
2. Year 1 Management Audit |
5 |
|
3. Year 2 Hr Plan |
10 |
|
4. Final Report |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Case analysis (Individual grade) |
30 |
|
|
|
|
Final exam (Individual grade) |
30 |
|
Total |
100 |
CLASS SCHEDULE
|
Class |
Subject |
Preparation |
|
1 1/13 |
§ Introduction § Description of the simulation § Lecture: The next agenda for competitiveness and the changing nature of human resources |
|
|
2 1/20 |
§ Formation of simulation of teams § Team quiz-HR simulation § Simulation practice decision |
Read: Chapter 1 Human Resources Management Simulation |
|
3 1/27 |
§ Lecture: Becoming a strategic partner § Discussion: Creating a Human Resources Business plan § Exercise: Prepare simulation HR business plan (mission, values, strategy and goals) |
Read: Creating a HR Business Plan Read: Values Make the Company |
|
4 2/3 |
§ Exercise: Prepare decision 1 and incident A § Discussion: Incident A § Case Discussion: People Express |
Read & Prepare: People Express Read: Just Another Day in HR |
|
5 2/10 |
§ Exercise: Prepare decision 2 and incident F § Discussion: Incident F § Case Discussion: Apple Computer - The HR Function |
Read & Prepare: Apple Computer - The HR Function Read: A Day in the Life of John Harvey - Positioning HR for the Fast Track |
|
6 2/17 |
§ Exercise: Prepare decision 3 and incident B § Discussion: Incident B § Case Discussion: Why Doesn't this HR Department Get Any Respect § Lecture: Becoming an administrative expert |
Read & Prepare: Why Doesn't this HR Department Get Any Respect Read: A Day in the Life of Jim Thomas - Moving HR from Control to service |
|
7 2/24 |
§ Exercise: Prepare decision 4 and incident I § Discussion: Incident I § Exercise: Prepare year 1 audit and year 2 HR business plan |
Read: A day in the Life of Linda Duffy - Putting Fun Into Work |
|
8 3/3 |
§ Exercise: Prepare decision 5 and incident H § Discussion: Incident H § Demonstration: Performance Now § Lecture: Becoming an employee champion |
Read: Nine common mistakes made when disciplining employees Read: Positive discipline-sending the right and wrong message |
|
9 3/10 |
§ Exercise: Prepare decision 6 and incident G § Discussion: Incident G § Video: Dealing with Discipline § Case Discussions: I'm Innocent |
Read & Prepare: I'm Innocent |
|
3/17 |
§ Spring
Break-no class
|
|
|
10 3/24 |
§ Exercise: Prepare decision 7 and incident L § Discussion: Incident L § Case Discussion: United Parcel Service § Case Discussion: The Unpopular Pay Plan |
Read & Prepare: United Parcel Service Read & Prepare: The Case of the Unpopular Pay Plan |
|
11 3/31 |
§ Exercise: Prepare decision 8 and incident M § Discussion: Incident M § Exercise: Prepare simulation final report |
Read: A Day in the Life of Don Borwhat - Coaching Teams for High Involvement |
|
12 4/7 |
§ Case Discussion: Are You Staying? § Lecture: Becoming a change agent § Case Discussion: GE Canada-Designing a New Organization |
Read & Prepare: Are You Staying? Read & Prepare: GE Canada |
|
13 4/14 |
§ Presentations:
Team reports on simulation
|
Read: A Day in the Life of Terri Wolfe - Maintaining Corporate Culture |
|
14 4/21 |
§ Case Discussion: Sears § Discussion: Managing in an Information Age And A Career-Resilient Workforce |
Read & Prepare: Sears Read: Managing in an Information Age-Organizational Challenges and Opportunities Read: Toward a Career-Resilient Workforce |
|
15 4/28 |
§ Final exam - submit take home exam no later than this date |
|
Human Resource Plan
Year _____
HR Department Number _____ Location ________________
Team Members __________________________________________________________
Mission: (Purpose of the department)
Values: (Guiding HR principles relating to the
Company's employee)
Strategy: (How are you going to approach the
management of the department to achieve your goals)
Goals & Action Plans: (State what you plan to
accomplish this year. The goals should be specific and measurable. Each goal
should be accompanied by an action plan. In some instances you may think a
particular action will serve more than one goal. If so repeat the action for
each goal.)
|
Factor |
Starting Value |
Goal |
Action Plans |
|
Quantity |
50 |
|
|
|
Productivity |
200 |
|
|
|
Accident Rate |
494 |
|
|
|
Turnover (%) |
9.8 |
|
|
|
Morale |
50 |
|
|
|
Grievances |
31 |
|
|
|
Absenteeism |
498 |
|
|
|
Minorities |
51 |
|
|
|
Females |
83 |
|
|
Human Resource Plan
Evaluation
Department Number _____ Year ______ Location ______________
Team Members __________________________________________________________
Plan Evaluation Score ______/40 = _____%
|
0 |
2 3 |
4 5 |
|
General statement which could apply to a variety of departments and would really not direct behavior |
Appropriate statement of purpose but it is not clearly written or focused so as to guide plans and actions |
Clear, focused mission statement which sets forth the department's purpose and would guide plans and actions |
|
0 |
2 3 |
4 5 |
|
Limited, incomplete or inconsistent listing and description of values which may not integrate with mission |
Appropriate but very limited value statements. Needs more thought. |
Thoughtful listing and description of appropriate values in keeping with mission statement |
|
0 |
2 3 |
4 5 |
|
Limited and/or generic strategy statements which may conflict with mission and values |
Appropriate but limited strategy statements. Needs to be more complete |
Specific, coherent, and appropriate strategy for achieving the first year goals |
|
0 |
2 3 |
4 5 |
|
Limited, non-specific goals which cannot be effectively carried out or measured within the parameters of the simulation |
Appropriate goals but they do not meet the SMART criteria so their achievement cannot be measured |
SMART goals which cover the key areas necessary to carry out the expressed strategy |
|
0 |
4 5 6 |
7 8 |
|
No or inadequate action plans |
Limited action plans which will only partially allow the achievement of goals |
Realistic action plans which will lead to the accomplishment of the specific goals |
|
2 4 |
6 8 |
10 12 |
|
Overall, the plan has logical inconsistencies and/or it is not measurable |
Overall, a good plan but it lacks integration and/or
measurability |
Overall, clear, integrated, measurable HR plan |
MANAGEMENT AUDIT
Department Number _____ Location _____________
Team Members ______________________________________________________________
1. What are the strengths of your HR program at this time?
2. What are the weaknesses of your HR program at this time?
3. What is your performance at this time (complete the following table)?
|
Factor |
Starting Value |
Goal |
Actual (Average - 4 qtrs) |
% Improvement |
|
Quality |
|
|
|
|
|
Productivity |
|
|
|
|
|
Accident Rate |
|
|
|
|
|
Turnover (%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Morale |
|
|
|
|
|
Grievances |
|
|
|
|
|
Absenteeism |
|
|
|
|
|
Minorities |
|
|
|
|
|
Females |
|
|
|
|
4. What kinds of actions worked for you and what didn't work as expected?
5. What do you need to focus upon in your year 2 business plan?
Presentation Evaluation
Department Number _____ Location _______________
Team Members
_______________________________________________________________
Score ______/40 = ______%
Quality of Presentation Visuals
|
1 2 3 |
4 5 6 |
8 9 10 |
|
Needs improvement - visuals lack variety, interest, and/or meaningfulness |
Good - acceptable as to being attractive, interesting, and meaningful visuals |
Above average - Attractive, interesting, and meaningful visuals |
Quality of Presentation
|
1 2 3 |
4 5 6 |
8 9 10 |
|
Needs improvement - not well prepared or ineffective in presenting the information |
Good - prepared but failed to capture attention or work smoothly through the presentation |
Above average - very well prepared, articulate, animated, and interesting |
Content of the Presentation
|
10 11 12 |
14 15 16 |
18 19 20 |
|
Needs improvement - little insight to the managing of the department. Decisions seemed to have been by guesswork rather than analysis. Little improvement on the key factors. |
Good - gave a clear picture of their two-year stewardship. Supportive but incomplete analysis. Some insight into managing the HR function. Good improvement on the key factors. |
Above average - gave a clear picture of their two-year stewardship. Reflected careful and complete analysis. Considerable insight into managing the HR function. Significant and balanced improvement on the key factors. |