Time-Compression Technologies Magazine Archive 2002 (and backfills for previous years)
/ DB reference years
PREV and NEXT link to numerically adjacent references for this DATABASE UPDATE.
CONTENTS links to the title list for this UPDATE's references.
Author Bill Jennings and Kevin Bourne
Source Time Compression Technologies. v6 n4 May, 2001, pp 28-31
Abstract Designers have two available options when making analysis decisions: numerical analysis (virtual prototyping) or analytical analysis verified by prototyping and empirical measurement (physical prototyping). While there are many tools at the designer's disposal, not all of them are optimum or even desirable for any one instance. The primary goal of the designer is to meet the system requirements. However, in order for his/her project to be deemed a total success it also must meet the budget and schedule goals. It is the combination of all three of these goals that will determine which tools he/she must use. The decision of which route to follow is primarily influenced by schedule, cost and design. There are definite advantages and disadvantages to both numerical and analytical analysis: XX
Time-Compression Technologies Magazine
c/o CTI Publishing
301 South Main Street, Suite 1 West
Doylestown, PA 18901
215-230-9556 Ext. 105
215-230-9603 FX
Email : Christina Fuges