Psychology and Spirituality
Pastoral Ministries Program,
Santa Clara University (last taught Winter 2002)
Lecture 5: Personality Types
Romans 12:4-6a:
For as in one body we have many members, and not all the members have the
same function, {5} so we, who are many, are one body in Christ, and individually
we are members one of another. {6} We have gifts that differ according to
the grace given to us... (NRSV)
Personality types
As we noted in first lecture,
psych theory gives different "cuts" on experience; personality
theories value different aspects and define "personality" differently
Brainstorm: what is personality? What do we mean when
we say pets have personality? Objects?
A relatively consistent way of dealing with the world, behavior
Something unique to the person
Websters:
the quality or fact of being a person
the quality or fact of being a particular person; personal identity;
individuality
habitual patterns and qualities of behavior of any individual
as expressed by physical and mental activities and attitudes;
distinctive individual qualities of a person, considered collectively
the sum of such qualities as impressing or likely to impress
others; as in "she has personality"
Other theories of personality:
Galen: 200 BCE -- the four humors: personality affected by the
balance of bodily fluids. Although his physical theory has been discarded,
his general grouping of personality types seems more enduring
sanguine- blood
melancholic- black bile
choleric- yellow bile
phlegmatic- phlegm
Freud: psychodynamics of ego, superego and id (chariot, driver
and horse)
Trait theory/ phenomenology— Eysenck 1950's (see chart)
Astrological types (signs); palmistry (lines on the palm); phrenology
(reading bumps on head-- Nazis experimented with this, believed that certain
personality traits were linked to "Jewish" physical features);
somatology (body types-- ectomorph, endomorph, mesomorph)
Enneagram: nine types based on early coping styles. Philosophical
system, introduced to West by Gurdjieff. Not a psychological system; not
empirically tested.
Other psychological tests: Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory
(MMPI) (used to diagnose pathology), Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
(telling stories about pictures) and Rorshach Ink Blot test. Mostly
used to identify personality problems, not to understand interactions.
Worked with journals and individuals to refine a reliable test for types;
had already begun to outline her theory before she read Jung
Test questions carefully developed and validated against known personalities.
(Goldsmith test is an effor to begin a similar test, but has not been
validated as yet.)
Took Jung's perceiving/judging functions and made them into fourth factor;
allowing clearer understanding of interactions of type factors
Type factors:
Introvert/ Extravert: the data that is important;
characteristic relationship to outer or inner world; describes direction
of energy flow
introvert- concerned with inner facts/ experience/ reality
extravert- concerned with outer world
Sensing/ Intuitive: perception; the mode of
processing information;
sensing- based on sensory data- sight/ hearing/ taste, etc
intuiting- based on grasping wholes, interrelationships, "hunches"
Thinking/Feeling:valuing and judgement
Thinking- measures information in relation to logic
Feeling-- measured in relation to people and relationships
(not the same as emotion; Jung considered this a rational
function)
Judging/Perceiving: preferred relationship to the outer
world, the extraverted function
Judging- needing closure, completion, decision
Perceiving- looking for new information; keeping the question
open
What would you like the opposite type to understand about your type?
What do you value about the other type?
Other Models using the functions:
Kiersey's Temperaments (1984,
1998): four basic types NF,
NT, SP, SJ. Based on how the person uses words (Abstract/ Concrete) and
how they work on tasks (Cooperative/ Utilitarian) (see chart)
Gary Harbaugh (1990):
From Image to Likeness: A Jungian Path in the Gospel Journey.:
ST: Gift of Practicality: Living in the Here and Now
SF: Personal Helpfulness: Reaching Out and Lifting Up
NF: Possibilities for People: Keeping Hope Alive
NT: Looking Ahead: Letting the Future Guide the Present
Peter Richardson (1996):
Four Spiritualities (see chart)
NT: Journey of Unity
Key issues:
Organizing principles operating throughout life and nature
Truth that can be global, honest and clear
Social justice as the aim and context for involvement (opposing
ignorance with education)
Clarity as the basis for spiritual enlightenment
Mentors (12% of population):
The Buddha, Buckminster Fuller
Gifts: researchers, literature, peacemakers
SF: The Journey of Devotion
Key issues:
Importance of pilgrimage
Attraction of heroes
Agency of stories
Hands-on approach to spirituality
Appearance of archaic forms
Orgiastic mysteries; incarnational presence
Centrality of Personal experience
Importance of simple things
Direct service
Bhakti yoga: the path of devotion
Mentors: (38%)
Mohammed, St. Francis
Stress: Problems arising from NT bias; SF seen as common
or anachronistic; Need to find mutual support
Gifts: traditionalists; continuity
ST: The Journey of Works
Key issues:
Law, Covenant, and Order
Strong sense of right and importance of righteousness
Sense of responsibility and stewardship for personal, social
and natural resources
Clear-cut identity as essential
Work itself as life's aim
Realist orientation
Proclivity to administration
Sense, often tragic, of justification
Mentors (38%):
Moses, Confucious
Gifts: practicality; definition, plans and rules (often resistant
to psychologizing religion)
NF: The Journey of Harmony
Key issues:
Quest toward authentic, actualized selfhood
Mystical harmony
Life attitude of expectancy
Importance of openness to healing and place of the dream
in this process
Social idealism
Focus on process in relationships, familial and social.
Mentors:
Rabindranath Tagore, Jesus of Nazareth
Gifts: carriers of tradition from one culture to another: common
in neo-pagan, hindu and native American religions; peacemakers
Dominant Functions:
Functions can be either introvertedor extraverted;
they will take different forms depending on the orientation
Each person has a preferred function- most developed, secure; this is
known as the Dominant Function.
(Conscious)
A secondary, less-developed function is the Auxiliary
Function. It must be from the other polarity from the
dominant (S/N or T/F, thus, if the dominant function is S, the auxiliary
must be T or F; if the dominant is F, the auxiliary must be S or N)
The TertiaryFunction is the opposite
from the Auxiliary; both the Auxiliary and Teriary functions are partly
unconscious
The Inferior or least-preferred function
is the opposite of the dominant.
To determine the dominant and auxiliary functions: [see chart]
Look at the last letter of the type (Jor P); this indicates the
characteristic relationship to the outside world, and thus will indicate
which function is extraverted
If it is J, then the judging function (T or F) is extraverted
If it is P, then the perceiving function (N or S) is
extraverted
Now look at the first letter. This indicates whether the dominant
function is introverted or extraverted
If it is E, then the extraverted
function (indicated by the fourth letter) is the dominant
function, and the other (introverted) function is the auxiliary
if it is I, then the extraverted
function (indicated by the fourth letter) is the auxiliary
function, and the other (introverted) function is the dominant
Importance of knowing dominant and inferior functions
It is possible for people to act out of both sides; goal of growth is
unity and balance; knowing your characteristic ways of functioning can
point you in new directions
The inferior function can sometimes come up (much like the Shadow) and
affect one's attitudes and behavior