Noise Pollution

The initial 20 FedEx flights will increase to at least 60.  These flights will operate at night:  incoming cargo jets will arrive within an hour’s window of time sometime between Midnight and 2:00AM; then the 60 cargo jets will all depart sometime between 3:00AM and 5:00AM.  Each flight includes landing, taxiing, and takeoff.  Because several flights may arrive at the same time, some may be required to circle overhead in holding patterns.  According to 1998 FAA hourly operations data for PTIA, currently there are less than 4 flights operating between Midnight and 5:00AM, and, contrary to what Dan Lynch says, there are only 9.5 flights total between 11:00PM and 6:00AM.

At least 120 trucks will be used to service the cargo hub, increasing air pollution and highway congestion. In addition, FedEx anticipates "over 200 in-bound and out-bound truck operations" on the weekend.

The noise from the FedEx flights will negatively impact people living many miles away from the airport, as it has in Memphis and Indianapolis where FedEx hubs are located.  In Memphis 12,000 property owners living 6 to 8 miles from the airport recently won a lawsuit for noise compensation.  Another 1400 homes were bought in Memphis.  In Indianapolis 958 homes are being purchased, most within 4 miles of the airport.  In Louisville, KY, where a UPS air cargo hub is located, 4000 homes are being bought and a whole town in the flight path is being moved.  (See www.npr.org; type in the keyword “Minor Lane Heights” and select the November 5, 1998, Morning Edition show. Requires RealPlayer to hear broadcast.)

In Greensboro, the tax value of the 4,019 homes in the flight path of just one runway (the proposed third runway)  is over $634 Million.  The tax value of the 4,884 homes in the flight path of both the proposed third runway and the existing main runway is $760 Million. 

The addition to FedEx planes of “hush kits,” mufflers that help reduce noise on aircraft with older engines, will not solve the noise problem.  Hush-kitted aircraft still produce much more noise than aircraft equipped with modern engines.  According to the Charlotte-Douglas International Airport draft Environmental Impact Study, the Sound Exposure Level (SEL or What You Actually Hear) for a single HUSH-KITTED 727 jet departure is 95dB up to 4 miles away.  At night, this sound is roughly equivalent to the sound of thunder.  The FAA recognizes that interference with sleep begins to occur above 40 dB and interference with speech above 45 dB.  Various studies have found that nocturnal aircraft noise has a negative impact on people’s physical and psychological well-being. (FedEx is now claiming--6/18/99 Bus. Jrnl.- that it will have phased out most of its 727s by 2005 and replaced them with Airbuses, DC-10s, and MD-11s.  Citizens Aviation Watch reports that so-called “quieter planes” may generate less high-pitched frequencies, which is the kind of noise the FAA concentrates on, but they generate MORE lower pitched frequencies—the rumbles that cause your house to shake and the windows to rattle.  “Some of these new planes make MORE noise than the old ones as the flow of air over these huge aircraft is noisier than their idling engines.” 

To figure noise cones, the FAA averages out the various SELs for a whole 24 hour day (Ldni: Day-Night Average Sound Level): this means that periods of quiet are averaged in with noise from flight operations.  (A “flight” consists of two “flight operations”:  a landing and a departure.  PTIA currently has only 57 flights per day of the Air Carrier (heavy aircraft) variety.)  This AVERAGE is then further diluted by averaging out the flights per each end of the runways over a YEAR’s time (Ldn) --i.e., the number of flights per year per each end of each runway.  PTIA claims that 95% of FedEx departures will be to the Southwest (i.e., 347 days) and 5% (18 days) to the Northeast.  If you are living at the end of the runway that FedEx flights are taking off over, you will be in a 75 dB Ldni contour 4 miles from the end of the runway for that day: the 65 dB contour will extend up to 12 miles.  (Four miles NE of the existing and proposed runways goes to about where Horsepen Creek Road meets Battleground.  Four miles SW of the runways goes to about where Southwest High School is located).  If you are on the other end of the runway when a jet is taking off, you will hear the jets taxiing and revving up their engines.  Within a 75 dB Ldn, houses are condemned; at 65 dB Ldn the FAA recognizes that some noise compensation is due.  BUT this averaging for a whole year, the typical method used in airport noise measurement, hides the problem.  You WILL hear the noise SEVERAL MILES AWAY.

According to the 1996-97 edition of the National Business Aircraft Association (NBAA) Airport Noise Summary, 622 airports in the U.S. have some sort of restriction on aircraft noise as a requirement for flight operations.  These constraints include nighttime curfews, specified decibel levels for airport access, and recommended avoidance of areas with schools or residences.  Many other cities around the world either ban or severely restrict night flights.  The European Parliament passed a resolution to ban all night flights in all its member countries to protect local residents from aircraft noise.  In civilized societies, a balance is sought between growth and quality of life.

The RDU Airport has a 3-mile nonresidential area at each end of its runways.  Even so, the residents there still had a problem with aircraft noise:  In 1992, the Raleigh airport settled lawsuits with 125 Wake County property owners bothered by plane noise even though their land lay far outside the 65-decibel zone.  (The proposed third runway in Greensboro would end just ½ mile from residential areas.  It would also mean cutting down all those trees that now provide a natural noise barrier from the present runways). 

You can file a noise complaint with the PTI airport by calling 665-5600.  Details should include your address and the date and time of each occurrence.  You may file several complaints in a single call.  Call in complaints as promptly as possible (within 24 hours).

Back to top



 
 

Click here for Noise Facts

Links
US-EPA. "Noise: a health problem." 1978
US-EPA. "Sound Levels and Relative Loudness"

Noise Studies, Children:
Dr. Arline Bronzaft's Articles:
Beware: Noise Is Hazardous to Our Children’s Development
A Voice to End the Government's Silence on Noise
It Takes a 'Silent' Village to Harm a Child

Dr. Gary Evan's Studies:
http://www.news.cornell.edu/releases/march98/noise.stress.ssl.html
http://www.news.cornell.edu/science/april97/noise.reading.ssl.html
 

Additional Resources:

Bronzaft, A. L. Effects of Noise. In Encyclopedia of Environmental Science and Engineering. (1998). Edited by J. R. Pfafflin and E. N. Ziegler. Netherlands: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

Review article includes definition of sound and noise, physiological and psychological effects of noise, responsibility of government, planning and designing for quiet, and discussion of efforts of organizations combating noises.

Bronzaft, A. L. Noise Sources, Health Impacts and Legal Remedies: A Psychologist's Perspective. (1998). Environmental Law in New York. New York: Matthew Bender.

Discusses the sources of noises and mental and physical health impacts but the major focus is on the law and noise on the federal and New York State level.

Bronzaft, A., Ahern, K. D., McGinn, R., O'Connor, J. and Savino, B. Aircraft Noise: A Potential Health Hazard. In Environment and Behavior, January 1998, Volume 30, pp 101-113.

Abstract: A questionnaire distributed to two groups, one living within the flight pattern of a major airport and the other in a nonflight area, sought to determine whether these groups would respond differently to questionnaires pertaining to noise, health perception, and quality of life issues. Nearly 70% of the residents living within the flight corridors reported themselves bothered by aircraft noise. Aircraft noise, in contrast to other bothersome noises, interfered more frequently with daily activities. Subjects who were bothered aircraft noise were more likely to complain of sleep difficulties and more likely to perceive themselves to be in poorer health. This study's finding of a possible realtionship betweeen noise and adverse health effects might encourage policy makers to enact pending antinoise legislation and to fund further noise research.

Please share this study with public officials, neighbors, and all interested in effects of noise on health. With 70% of the subjects reporting being bothered by noise, it can't be said that only a few are bothered. Daily activities interfered with: watching television, sleeping, opening windows, sleep. These are all important to a good "quality of life."

For more information: Contact Arline L. Bronzaft, Ph.D., 505 E. 79th Street, New York, NY 10021. -- email: albtor@aol.com

Back to top


This page was last updated on 09-30-00

Have technical questions or feedback about this site?
Please email the webmaster with comments.