A
Diary of Public Events
and
Notices of My Life and Family
and
Of My Private Transactions
Studies, Travels, Readings
From
January 1st, 1845
to
August, 1845
and
Sketch of my Life from Infancy
by
Samuel Hervey Laughlin
In April, 1845, Samuel
Hervey Laughlin wrote, "Those were pleasant days---their memory is full of
sweet melancholy---and I pen these events here, knowing that no eyes but
those of my children, grandchildren, or those who will hold my memory in
equal respect, will ever see what I now write. I wish my father or grandfathers
had written and left just such free, unreserved, and full memoirs, however
badly or hastily written."
Mr. Laughlin comprehended the importance, to following generations, of the
accounts of an individual's daily life and personal activities. Such information
often fills a void for historians and those trying to gain an in depth
understanding of past events and circumstances.
This diary was transcribed by Anabel Easley Tidwell, a direct descendant
of Samuel Hervey Laughlin, and her daughter-in-law, Janet Malone Tidwell.
It is their hope that in reading these pages their children and grandchildren,
and any other interested parties, will have a greater understanding and
appreciation for the life and times of this illustrious gentleman.
A Diary, Etc. for the year 1845-
Introduction
In the year 1834, commencing in the month of December, during a journey from
Nashville, Tennessee, where I then lived to Washington City, made for the
purpose of concluding arrangements for the establishment of a newspaper at
Nashville, to be called "The Union", I commenced and kept a journal of my
travels, embracing remarks on political events, discussions, notes of
consultations etc. which is preserved among my books and papers, bound up
with a similar diary kept during my journey to the Democratic National Convention
at Baltimore in May 1840, and also notes made during my journey to the Baltimore
Convention of 1844, by which J. K. Polk was nominated as a canidate for the
Presidency. These former diaries and journals I refer to as containing my
notes and remarks on men and events, and my personal participation in the
several transactions to which they relate. They also contain in separate
diaries (but bound together) of my participation in the legislative measures
of the General Assembly of the State of Tennessee, at its several sessions
from October 1839 to perhaps January, 1844, I having served in the State
Senate from the district first composed of the counties of Warren, Franklin,
and portions of the new counties of Coffee, Cannon, DeKalb, and Van Buren,
and subsequently under the new apportionment of 1841-2 of the counties of
Warren, Cannon, Coffee, DeKalb, and the territory now composing Grundy County.
In 1839, at the instance and on petition of Uriah York, Wm. Armstrong as
a surveyor, and of three or four hundred citizens living on Caney Fork of
Cumberland, Rocky River, CaneCreek, etc. I procured the new county of Van
Buren to be established, and, as there were then a majority of democratic
members in both branches of the Assembly, I had the honor of giving the name
of Mr. Van Buren to it; and the Seat of Justice, Spencer, was
named by Mr. Samuel Turney, a Senator from White County. In 1843-4 on the
petition of large numbers of citizens living on the head of the Elk River,
Hickory Creek, Collins River, and Cumberland Mountain, I assisted zealously
in the State Senate in getting Grundy County established, and by my pertinacious
perserverance, got it named after my old and valued friend, Felix Grundy,
who had died in November 1840, while holding the appointment of Senator in
Congress, which I had aided in bestowing upon him in the winter of 1840,
and in inducing him to resign the office of Attorney General of the U.S.
which he then held under an appointment from President Van Buren. In May,
1840, as a member of the Baltimore Convention, he had aided powerfully by
his wise counsels and eloquence, in producing harmony in that body, resulting
in the unanimous nomination of Mr. Van Buren for re-election to the Presidence,
and a unanimous agreement to nominate no democratic candidate for the Vice
Presidency. This was done to produce harmony. Col. Johnson desired a
re-nomination. In Tennessee, in the Assembly in 1839, I had introduced, and
the democracy had carried a legislative nomination of Mr. Van Buren and Col.
James K. Polk for these high offices. When the convention was about to meet,
to prevent all collisions of claims, Col. Polk magnanimously withdrew his
name-but these matters are all noted in the diaries referred to and form
only a digression and brief repetition here. One word, however, in regard
to Mr. Grundy before I proceed with this introduction. In the recess of Congress
in 1840, he labored incessantly in public discussions and in speeches in
favor Mr. Van Bursn's re-election. He returned home from Washington in the
spring and early summer, after congress adjourned. Through Virginia and East
Tennessee, by way of Abingdon, Knoxville, McMinnville, etc. to Nashville,
accompanied by Hon. Hopkins L. Turney, and Harvey M. Waterson, they being
representatives in Congress, he made speeches to the people (Mr. T. &
W. doing the same) at nearly every town and place of public note on the whole
route. At McMinnville, my county town, my residence being at Hickory Hill,
one mile distant from it, these gentlemen, Mr. Grundy leading, all made speeches
to a very large and attentive assembly of people, including many ladies.
This was in the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. Mr. G. although indisposed,
laboring under an invetorate derangement of the bowels, made one of the happiest
efforts I have ever heard him make. I had been in the habit of hearing Mr.
Grundy at the Bar and in the Assembly, and before the people, and then more
recently in Congress from the fall of 1815, when I removed from McMinnville
to Murfreesboro for the purpose of concluding my studies, and engaging in
the practice of law. After I came to the Bar, and had been elected Attorney
General, at the very outset of my professional career, in 1817, I was thrown
into constant professional and social intercourse with him. He honored me
thus early with his confidence and friendship, and it continued without
abatement-in fact greatly increased on both our parts-up to the day of his
death. He was a really great man. He never was a hard student as far as reading
books was concerned, but he read men-he understood men at first sight, as
if by intuition, better than any man I have ever known. He was in another
sense an intense student. He was more in the habit of what Mr. Wirt, in the
British Spy denominates "Close and solid thinking", than was known generally,
even to his most intimate friends. In the progress of the trial of great
causes in court, especially criminal cases, his habit was to take but very
brief notes of leading facts and points. When the court would adjourn over
to the next day, Mr. Grundy was always among the first to leave the court
room, and retire to his lodgings, and from that moment until after tea or
supper, he mingled with every person about him in all manner of cheerful
conversation, telling anecdotes which he did inimitably, and in hearing and
joining in the heartiest laughs at those told by others. He always seemed
to have forgotten the cause in hand, even if it were one of life and death.
But after this relaxation, and eating temperately, he immediately retired
to his room. He generally preferred to have some friend with him in his room
at all times. On such occasions, I have no doubt, I have spent a hundred
nights in his room, rooming together during the fifteen or sixteen years
we attended courts from our respective homes together. If the weather were
cold, he always, if the beds were large enough, preferred sleeping together.
After going to his room, unless some indispensable consulation prevented,
he was always the first to propose going to bed, and he always had the unusual
and extraordinary power, by abstracting all his thoughts, of going to sleep
in two or three minutes after the time came when he chose to sleep. Going
to bed, and to sleep this early, and always sleeping soundly, he usually
awoke about one o'clock in the morning. It was then, and not until
then, that he commenced the intense and profound study and preparation
of his case, and arranged in his own mind, all the heads of the speech he
had to make the next day, or before the case closed. If the trial lasted
three or four days, as many important cases, civil as well as criminal often
did, this nightly task of study and preparation was regularly taken up every
night, but always with more care and system the night before he had to deliver
his argument. Even in chancery cases, after the reading of all papers and
records and notes taken of dates, leading points fixed and concluded by proofs
and depositions, he made the same nocturnal preparation. Even the splendid
sentences, and occasional poetical or classical quotations by which he
embellished his speeches before juries, were thus prepared, perfectly committed
to memory-and nothing committed to his memory was ever lost or forgotten-and
the order and connection in which he would introduce them were all thus arranged
and prepared. To me, for a great many years, he made no secret of his art.
To those who heard him in court, and saw him scarcely ever looking at or
taking a note unless it were in the conclusion of a speech, where he would
occasionally turn over and look at his notes, out of abundant caution for
fear the warmth of debate had caused him to overlook some fact or authority,
I say, to the lookers-on, all this appeared perfectly extempore, when in
fact it was the effect of cautious and careful preparation. Such, however,
was the exuberance of his splendid imagination and the excellence of his
memory, that upon thousands of occasions, upon incidental points arriving,
offhand, and altogether extempore, he made many of his most masterly speeches,
both for eloquence and argument. Scarcely any many ever lived who needed
the discipline and preparation to which he schooled himself, less than he
did. But he felt it to be a duty to his client, to his causes and himself,
lest by a more careless method, he might perchance omit some argument or
some ground which would be beneficial to his cause. In all cases, when the
proofs were all submitted, he saw at once, with perfect intuition, the very
point-or the several points-always few however-upon which the cause must
turn. To fortify and maintain these, throwing all extransous matters to the
winds, was his method. Hence, generally, his speeches were not labored or
very long-never apparently too long or too short. The great controlling faculty
of his mind was his profound and clear judgement. He was embued with a greater
share-always ready and always at hand-of common sense than any man
I was ever acquainted with. The man nearer to him in this respect, whom I
have known, is his favorite pupil and friend, James K. Polk, the present
President of the United States.
Mr. Grundy by his labors in the public cause of democracy, in which he believed
the best interests of his country were at hazard, during the presidential
canvass of 1840-his traveling to distant places, over-fatiguing himself-and
neglecting the constant disordered state of his stomach and bowels-caused
the disease to become so permanently seated that he was compelled at length
to retire to his own house and shortly to be confined to his own room. He
was still cheerful, apprehending no immediate danger, although he suffered
much, and had become considerably emaciated and enfeebled. He still took
a lively interest in the pending contest, and all his regrets were occasioned
by the madness, folly, ribaldry, and infatuation of the Whigs and people
misled by them, under their false professions and promises, and their ridiculous
emblems of coons, canoes on dry land and other absurdities. He continued,
however, to grow worse and worse, and weaker and weaker, until his kind
physicians, Drs. Saml. Hogg and Felix Robertson-two of his oldest and best
friends-despaired of his life. He was surrounded by a most affectionate family,
and his excellent wife-the beloved wife of his youth-were unremitting in
ministering to all his comforts. At last, it was foreseen that he must die,
He was in his perfect mind, and believed so himself. One of his physicians,
while he pressed his hand, and with eyes suffused with tears and a choked
voice, whispered kindly to him that they had concluded it to be their duty
to tell him as a Christian man that he could not live much longer. He returned
the pressure of the hand, and said calmly, the Lord's will, not mine,
be done. This was nearly the last words he uttered.
After his death, in winter of 1843-4, at the request of Mrs. Grundy, Mr.
William W. Bass, his son-in-law, consulted me, and put into my hands various
drafts of inscriptions to be put on a monument which they had bespoke in
Philadelphia, and which was nearly completed except for the inscription.
One was by Mr. Silas Wright, now Governer of New York, with whom Mr. Grundy
had served long in the Senate of the United States, and the other, intended
for a different side of the monument, or rather cenotaph, by Mr. Bass himself.
I made copies of both at Hickory Hill, adding some points in the public life
of Mr. Grundy, which I obtained from Marshall's and Butler's histories of
Kentucky, which had escaped the recollection of Mr. Wright and Mr. Bass.
With these additions, the inscriptions may now be read on the monument at
the public burial ground, near Nashville, where Mr. Grundy's remains repose.
Prior to his death, from about the year 1822, Mr Grundy had been a professing
Christian, and member of the Presbyterian church. Dr. Edgar, of Nashville,
his Pastor for whom he had a warm regard, preached his funeral sermon which
was published at the time, but the worthy Doctor, not being either eloquent
or a man of literature, it fell very far short of doing justice to the great
man in whose honor it was delivered.
Previous
Next
Download This Section
My Links
Back To Diary Start Page
  E-mail Me