THE THEORY OF CREATION

A SCIENTIFIC AND TRANSLATIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE BIBLICAL CREATION STORY


CHAPTER NINE

THE EVENING AND THE MORNING



There are some logistical problems with the standard interpretation of this phrase that may indicate something unconventional is taking place here. When and where does dawn arrive on a planet that is in constant rotation? Where is the reference point on the Earth that experiences the rising sun? At any time during a 24-hour day, the sun is both rising and setting somewhere on our planet. As experienced from the barren world of the First Day, without any reference point, it is impossible to differentiate between evening and morning. Both events are occurring simultaneously somewhere on our world. The problem is that these terms can only possess their traditional meanings from a particular location on the Earth. Since no such place is mentioned anywhere in the Creation Story, and the only stated reference point is the entire planet, these terms - as understood by the general reader - are illogical. The entire Earth cannot experience a morning or an evening.

This is the most compelling reason that I believe we should abandon the most common and popular definitions of "evening" and "morning" in this story. The word "evening" is not describing the setting of the sun, which is followed by twilight and then darkness. "Morning" is not the introduction of dawn, followed by a rising sun. Neither would make sense in this passage since the world experiences both events simultaneously, all of the time. Since the primary definitions produced illogical results, it is necessary to turn to secondary definitions. "Evening" can be thought of as an "end" or an "ending" to a period of creativity, while "morning" can be perceived as the "beginning" of another period of creativity.2


NOTE:
2. Hugh Ross, Genesis One: A Scientific Perspective, Rev. Ed. (Pasadena, CA: Reasons To Believe, 1983), p.17



(These are selected paragraphs within this chapter. This is not the entire chapter.)



RETURN