|

Home GCFC 2-3-2000 GCFC 2-18-2000 GCFC 3-2-2000 GCFC 3-17-2000 GCFC 4-11-2000 GCFC 4-25-2000 GCFC 5-11-2000 GCFC 5-23-2000 GCFC 6-15-00 Cable Ethics Public Finance Public Hearing 6-10-2000
| |
Greenburgh Campaign Finance
Commission
PUBLIC FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE
-
Voluntary local campaign finance
reforms should be adopted that include increased disclosure of campaign
contributions, lower contribution limits, limited restrictions on the source
of contributions, and mandatory debate provisions
State law preempts mandatory local
campaign contribution regulation. Therefore, compliance must be voluntary. The
subcommittee recommends the following voluntary reforms be pursued:
-
Disclosure by participating
candidates should be more frequent and more descriptive than state law
requires, and include the contributor’s name, residence, business address,
and name of employer.
-
To avoid any appearance of
corruption or undue influence, while not substantially disadvantaging
participants, participating candidates should limit individual contributions
for each election-- the primary election and the general election.
Currently, approximately $1000 is permitted for each election.
-
Participating candidates should
pledge not to accept "interested" contributions (such as from
developers doing business before the town’s boards).
-
Participating candidates should
be required to participate in a minimum number of debates held using League
of Women Voters’ debate guidelines.
-
Incentives are generally
offered to encourage candidates to voluntarily participate.
-
Cable access, as proposed by
the cable subcommittee, should be used as the primary or sole incentive
for candidate participation at the present time.
-
To date, the subcommittee has
not identified a desire by town residents to partially or wholly finance
the campaigns of local candidates with taxpayer funds. Therefore, the
proposed cable access incentive is a reasonable alternative.
The members should be nominated
and appointed in a manner that assures the commission will be non-partisan
or bipartisan. The commission should ensure participating candidates comply
with any local reform measures adopted and equitably receive any incentives
offered.
-
Matching funds: participating
candidates could receive a 2-1 match for contributions of $100 or less;
the actual ratio and the threshold amount would have to be established.
-
Block grants: participating
candidates could receive a lump sum contribution from the town of 25-50
percent of any spending limit imposed; the actual percentage would have to
be established.
-
Free or reduced-cost services
(other than cable television): the cost of a certain number of candidates’
mailings could be reimbursed, local voter guides with free space for each
candidate could be provided, etc., or
-
A mix of any/all of the above
[ Previous Page ] [ Home ] [ Up ] [ Next Page ]
|