VERSES MISSIONARIES IGNORE


Missionaries say that 300 verses in the Tanach support their beliefs.  Between the claim and the proof are some obstacles, but that's another story, one discussed elsewhere.   However, several verses in the Tanach refute missionary claims fairly directly.  When confronted with these verses, some missionaries rationalize, and others change the subject.  That they never cite these verses is worth noting.

The verses which missionaries do not like to cite show that:

  1. G-d is not a human  person
  2. Blood is not needed to forgive sin
  3. Torah is permanent and Mitzvot can be observed
  4. Deuteronomy 4
  5. The Messiah -- or an annointed?


1.  G-d is not a man.  Missionaries say that the 'son' aspect of their tri-partite god was the person Jesus.  (Sometimes they even seem to say the other two aspects were also human, but that's another story.)  They emphasize that they believe G-d became man, not that a man became G-d.  The Tanach makes no such distinction.  The Tanach says simply that G-d is not a man.

The same idea is expressed in a different way in Deuteronomy Chapter 4.  The text is explicit -- you saw no image at Horeb, so don't try to make a representation of G-d.

Missionaries sometimes say that G-d has changed since those words were written.  They assert that now G-d is indeed human, and if we Jews don't believe it, we will be consumed in the fires of hell..  However, the Bible says that G-d does not change and we will not be consumed.

Here is the list of the verses for easy copy and paste in chatrooms:

Back to the top.


2. Blood sacrifice is not essential for forgiveness.  Missionaries say that G-d must have blood in order to forgive sins.  I have even heard them make the blasphemous sounding statement that G-d is incapable, does not have the ability, to forgive without bloodshed.  Such an idea is primitive and barbaric, but that is not the point.  The point is that the Tanach does not agree.  According to Tanach, there are several acceptable means for repentance.

Micah Chapter 6 is particularly explicit as to what G-d wants:

Hosea Chapter 14 waxes poetic and describes words (of repentance) as if they were the animal sacrifices ("calves of our lips"):

The Psalmist expresses the same idea.

In 1 Kings 8, Solomon prays that G-d will forgive the sins of all those who ask in the temple, for example, verses 33 and 34 (JPS 1917)

1 Kings 8: 46 - 50 applys this even to people to pray to G-d and think of the temple in a foreign country where they can't make any sacrifices:

One can say that Solomon's prayer wasn't answered, but the text gives no indication of that.

Money (Exodus 30:15-16), jewelry (Numbers 31:50) or putting fire from the altar in a censure (Numbers 17:11) are also listed as means to forgiveness.

Hosea is specific that animal sacrifices will stop for a temporary period (as opposed to being stopped forever and replaced by something else.)

Here is the list of the verses for easy copy and paste in chatrooms:

Back to the top.


3. The commandments can indeed be followed.  Missionaries, following Paul's lead, say that the Torah and its commandments are impossible to follow and are are intended only to show us how bad we are.  Then will then cite examples which show conclusively that they do not understand what the commandments actually are.

The Torah was intended to be permanent, not a temporary measure to be set aside at a later time.  Missionaries claim that Jesus "fulfilled" the Torah so that it is no longer needed.  Torah says otherwise, and uses the phrase "eternal statute" ("hukat olam") 16 different times.  Of particular interest is the use of this phrase in relation to atonement.  

Consider also: Ezek 37:24  And David my servant shall be king over them; and they all shall have one shepherd: they shall also walk in my judgments, and observe my statutes, and do them.

Here is the list of the verses for easy copy and paste in chatrooms: Deut 6:25; Deut 30:11-14; Ps 19:7-8: Lev 16: 29 -34; Ezek 37:24

Back to the top.


4. Deuteronomy 4.  I have never seen Christians offer this chapter as an excuse for their beliefs, and with good reason.

(KJV) 15 Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the LORD spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: 16Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female, 17The likeness of any beast that is on the earth, the likeness of any winged fowl that flieth in the air, 18The likeness of any thing that creepeth on the ground, the likeness of any fish that is in the waters beneath the earth: 19And lest thou lift up thine eyes unto heaven, and when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them, which the LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven. 20But the LORD hath taken you, and brought you forth out of the iron furnace, even out of Egypt, to be unto him a people of inheritance, as ye are this day.

These verses pose two major problems for Christian beliefs.  As you can see from verse 3, with the reminder of how  those Jews who followed a false god died, this chapter is about the worship required of Jews.  The first problem for Christians comes in verses 15 and 16, with the prohibition against worship of anything in the likeness of a person.  It's quite specific - you didn't see anything at Horeb, so don't worship anything that you can see.  Need I say that Jesus had the likeness of a person?  Certainly all the pictures I've seen portray him that way.

The second problem, in verse 19, is more subtle.  It's a warning to be careful "when thou seest the sun, and the moon, and the stars, even all the host of heaven, shouldest be driven to worship them, and serve them."  The next part of the verse contains a remarkable phrase - "which the LORD thy God hath divided unto all nations under the whole heaven."  Some might say this refers only to G-d putting lights in the sky for everyone, but there are two problems with this idea.  First, the verb 'halek' has the implication of divide or apportion separately to different people and is different from the verb to give or the verb to place.  Secondly, the idea of a neutral astronomical comment being thrown into the middle of firm cautions about worship sounds strange.

I think this comment suggests that G-d gave the heavenly bodies for other peoples to worship as dieties.  Rashi also offers this as an explanation.  The warnings to Jews not to worship strange gods are numerous, and there are frequent references to what will happen at the end of days, but, to the best of my knowledge, nowhere does Tannach forbid other peoples of that era from worshipping strange gods, and numerous references are made without condemnation of other people doing so.  

So, while many Christians are convinced that G-d is as petty as they are and will punish with infinite torture anyone who doesn't have the right beliefs, the Bibilcal author gives no indication of agreeing with this idea.

Back to the top.


5. Bible refers less often to "The Messiah," than it does to "an annointed." (In construction.  Nag Zvi to finish it alreddy.)


Copyright 2001. This means only that you should give me credit by including my E-mail (fiddlerzvi@att.net) and webpage (http://home.att.net/~fiddlerzvi/) address and this copyright notice if you share this page with anyone.

 Back to Countermissionary Page

Let Zvi know what you think about this page.

Check out ZVI's HOME PAGE

Revised 4/09