[Congressional Record: April 24, 2002]
http://frwebgate6.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate.cgi?WAISdocID=952619328377+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve
[Congressional Record: April 24, 2002 (Extensions)]
[Page E622]
From the Congressional Record Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:cr24ap02-29]
EMERY FLIGHT 17 (DC-8) NTSB HEARING
______
HON. JOHN E. SWEENEY
of new york
in the house of representatives
Wednesday, April 24, 2002
Mr. SWEENEY. Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased that the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has scheduled a hearing for May 9th
regarding Emery flight 17 (DC-8) that crashed in Sacramento on February
16, 2000, killing its entire crew. I strongly urge the NTSB to follow
through with the scheduled hearing rather than postponing it as other
hearings have been postponed. The Captain of Emery 17 was Kevin P.
Stables, 43, of Berlin, New York, the First Officer was George Land,
35, of Placerville, California, and the Flight Engineer was Russell
Hicks, 38, of Sparks, Nevada. I look forward to the hearings as part of
the ongoing crash investigation to help prevent future air cargo
tragedies, encourage government and business accountability, and
enhance public confidence in the regulatory oversight of the rapidly
expanding air cargo industry.
On February 16, 2000, Emery flight 17, a DC-8, took off from
Sacramento en route to Dayton. Two minutes later, the massive jet
plowed into a salvage yard. National network news provided live
broadcasts of the fiery aftermath. The pictures were telling--none of
the crewmembers escaped alive.
Mr. Speaker, an exam of the wreckage found indications that part of
the DC-8's mechanical flight controls may not have been connected prior
to the flight. Key flight control components of that particular
airplane had been overhauled by a Federal Aviation Administration-
approved repair station three months before the crash. In August 2001,
the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) finally ``grounded'' Emery
and cited safety concerns that included ``mechanical irregularities''
and ``operating unairworthy aircraft.''
Mr. Speaker, Emery 17 is not the only DC-8 cargo jet in recent years
to wipe out its entire aircrew shortly after takeoff. Thirty months
earlier in Miami, Fine Air flight 101 slammed into the ground, burst
into flames, and killed five people. The probable cause finding
included the ``failure of the FAA to ensure that known cargo-related
deficiencies were corrected.'' Many believe the FAA's failure to
provide adequate oversight and its failure to enforce Federal Aviation
Regulations are direct causes of the Emery tragedy.
Almost immediately after Emery 17 crashed, safety groups and families
of the crews pushed hard for public hearings on the Emery accident and
the NTSB announced that official hearings would take place and would
center on contract maintenance and oversight by ``airline and FAA
personnel.'' Mr. Speaker, these were the identical issues for which the
NTSB criticized the FAA in the aftermath of ValuJet's 1996 crash.
Emery's own aircrews warned the FAA in the months leading up to Emery
flight 17's crash. In a 1998 letter to the FAA, Capt. Tom Rachford,
speaking for the Emery pilots' union, wrote, ``Our maintenance has
dramatically fallen off. . . . I can't say it any clearer: This airline
is going to put a hole in the ground and kill someone. Please don't let
this fall upon deaf ears.'' Later, five months before the fatal crash,
the Emery pilots' group expressed their concern yet again with FAA
leadership. They wrote: ``EWA is out of the regulator's eye. . . . Why
are the authorities continuing to turn a blind eye? The lower echelon
of the regulatory agencies have substantiated our concerns. . . .
However, it is the upper echelon that appears to be dragging its feet.
. . . If we have an accident in the near future, the subsequent
investigation will show sainthood on the part of ValuJet when compared
to Emery Worldwide Airlines. . . . Emery crews are living on borrowed
time.''
Mr. Speaker, it's been two long years since Emery 17 crashed. The
rapidly expanding air cargo industry is still waiting for the overdue
hearings. The air cargo industry is the fastest-growing segment of the
commercial airline industry. Many government and industry experts
consider oversight of third-party maintenance stations inadequate. The
NTSB has never before convened public hearings on an air-cargo-only
accident. I am pleased the board is sticking to its earlier decision
and promise to convene the Emery hearings. To many, this suggests a
turning point and an indication that relaxed oversight and maintenance,
and unsafe operational practices will no longer be ignored. I look
forward to expedient and thorough public hearings.
The U.S. government must not wait for another massive air cargo
disaster to force the NTSB into action. This is a race against time:
The NTSB must convene the public hearings on Emery 17 before another
air cargo blunder kills yet again.
____________________