1998 / Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings
PREV and NEXT link to numerically adjacent references for this YEAR.
CONTENTS links to the title list for this YEAR's references.
Author Neil Hopkinson, Phil Dickens, De Montfort University
Source Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings, 1998, pp 65-78
Abstract The AIM (TM) process has been used to successfully produce short runs of injection moulded parts. One of the main drawbacks of the process is the tendency of the tools to be damaged during part ejection. At De Montfort University a successful AIM moulding cycle has been developed in which simple shapes from polypropylene are produced and the ejection forces required are measured. Two different ejection methods are used; one uses conventional ejector pins and the other uses a conformal ejector pad. The tool surface roughness is measured before and after moulding to observe any changes caused by ejection. Results show that ejector pins require a lower ejection force than a conformal ejector pad and this may contribute to longer tool life for the AIM process. Possible reasons for the results are discussed along with recommendations for further work. (Auth abstract) [References: 6]
Solid Freeform Fabrication Proceedings can be obtained from: The Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium
or contact:
The University of Texas at Austin
Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication / Texas Materials Institute
Mechanical Engineering Dept.
c/o The Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium
MC C2200
Austin, TX 78712-1063 USA
512-471-3026; 512-471-7681 FX; Email: sffsymp@uts.cc.utexas.edu