2000 (and backfills for previous years) / DB reference years
PREV and NEXT link to numerically adjacent references for this DATABASE UPDATE.
CONTENTS links to the title list for this UPDATE's references.
Author McDonald JC, Duffy DC, Anderson JR, Chiu DT, Wu H, Schueller OJ, Whitesides GM Institution Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Source Electrophoresis 2000 Jan;21(1):27-40
Abstract Microfluidic devices are finding increasing application as analytical systems, biomedical devices, tools for chemistry and biochemistry, and systems for fundamental research. Conventional methods of fabricating microfluidic devices have centered on etching in glass and silicon. Fabrication of microfluidic devices in poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) by soft lithography provides faster, less expensive routes than these conventional methods to devices that handle aqueous solutions. These soft-lithographic methods are based on rapid prototyping and replica molding and are more accessible to chemists and biologists working under benchtop conditions than are the microelectronics-derived methods because, in soft lithography, devices do not need to be fabricated in a cleanroom. This paper describes devices fabricated in PDMS for separations, patterning of biological and nonbiological material, and components for integrated systems. XX