| The US first used balloon observers in the US Civil War. In 1907
and 1908, the Signal Corps renewed its experiments in balloon photography,
begun in 1893. In 1908, the Army Signal Corps established a
balloon plant at Fort Omaha, Nebraska. In 1908, experiments were also conducted
with radio receivers in balloons, proving the ability to receive messages
in Nebraska from as far away as Washington.
On November 11, 1916, Capt. Charles deF. Chandler, a former balloonist, was relieved as Director of the Signal Corps School at Fort Leavenworth, and was ordered to Fort Omaha via Washington, to set up a balloon school. He arrived in Omaha on 16 November (or so says the history; maybe it was December), and on 20 December, the organization was designated the US Army Balloon School. |
| The Balloon School provided a four-month course in operating captive
and free balloons.1
During the first world war, the Army set up two more schools to train personnel
in the various skills needed for balloon observation operations.2
My grandfather, Joseph S. Batt, was a balloon pilot (or rather, observer)
in the Aviation Section of the Army Signal Corps during WWI. After
completing Officer Training at Camp
Upton on Long Island in May, 1917, he attended the Balloon School Officers'
Course at Fort
Omaha, learning motors, gases, telephony and balloon construction,
and presumably earning balloon pilots' wings. He was shortly thereafter
designated an Aerial Observer, and was an instructor in cordage on the
Balloon School staff at Fort Omaha. He apparently served as an inspector
for the Army Bureau of Aircraft Production, assigned at the Connecticut
Aircraft Company, a manufacturer of lighter-than-air ships at New Haven,
Connecticut. In July, 1918, as a second lieutenant, he was transferred
to Camp
John Wise, in San Antonio, where he was promoted and assigned as Officer
In Charge of the Cordage and Fabric Schools and CO of the 68th Balloon
Company. He was discharged from active duty in March, 1919 and in
August, 1919 was commissioned with the rank of first lieutenant in the
reserves for 5 years.3
|
1Lt. Joseph S. Batt, Balloon Observer Aviation Section, U.S. Army Signal Corps |
| The
Observation balloons used by the U.S. Army in World War I were
very dangerous. Balloons definitely allowed observation and direction
of fire/movement from a height, solving the age-old problem of how to see
what the enemy was doing behind the next hill. Reaching altitudes
up to 5,000 feet, balloons were an immense improvement over ladders and
towers, treetops or steeples, or observation points exposed on the obvious
top of a hill. However, the visibility of the balloon to the enemy
and the vulnerability of its
ground
base to enemy artillery fire meant that it had to be placed miles behind
the front line, and away from other installations. Also, the balloon
had to be placed out of the trajectory of the artillery fire that it might
be used to direct. Thus, balloon observers weren't actually forward
observers or forward air controllers. (I think I've read of balloonists
who flew -- untethered, obviously -- across salient enemy positions, but
that couldn't be routine.) The term "forward observer" was an artillerist's
term for the guy who simply got closer to the front line than the officers
observing from the battery's base of fire. While some ground-based
observers actually got ahead of the friendly front line, it was the airplane
that allowed routine observation and fire direction from over/ahead of
the line of battle.
Radio was probably the other invention that allowed the forward air controller to actually work from above/ahead of the battlefield. Observers in tethered balloons communicated via telephones. Prior to the development of lightweight airborne radio transmitter-receiver sets, the aerial observer who spotted something had to fly back over "friendly" lines and drop message containers, putting a time lag between observation and fire direction. It also made communications easier when radio technology went beyond the stage where aircraft had to communicate with morse code; Radiotelegraphy did get through more reliably, with lower power requirements than radiotelephony, and it was widely used for aircraft communications well into World War II (and continued to be the mode of choice at times, up through the Korean War period). Also, through the 1950s, aircraft radios were limited by the need for a resonant crystal for each discrete frequency to be used. Modern FACs were fortunate to be able to simply dial in any required freq to talk with air traffic control, command posts, strike flights or friendly units. |
1. Hennessy, Juliette A.:
The
United States Army Air Arm: April 1861 to April 1917, Office of Air
Force History, Washington D.C., 1985. pp 15, 163.
2. US Air Force Museum: Balloon
Section web page <http://www.wpafb.af.mil/museum/history/ww1/ww1-9.htm>
3. Documents in my personal collection.
Created May 15, 2001; Updated most recently on July 12, 2001. Copyright reserved, Jim Gordon <CoveyIntel@WorldNET.ATT.net>