Worldwide Guide to Rapid Prototyping Printing the Future
Home prods links sb's patents Publ cont
From our mailbag ...


back BACK



Garage or home-brew versions of 3D printing?


Dear Ed,

Two ideas:

  1. .do you know of anyone who has achieved a reasonable degree of success in creating their own home-made version of a 3d printer (using plaster as the medium, like Z Corp.)?

I know software is half the battle, but assuming that the programming is in place, would a modified inkjet spraying water over a thin layer of plaster accomplish what the official versions are doing? Any possibility that we'll ever see $1000 3d printers for home hobbyists?

  1. How about 3d printing on a large scale using plaster/earth blends (see www.castearth.com) ? A grid supporting a water-spraying print head could be established on the building site. This "print head" could spray a stream of water adequate to saturate an inch or so of catalyzed plaster and earth.

The forms typically used for such processes would be unnecessary, and curved walls, etc. would be readily created. Now...how to spread the plaster/earth and remove the excess...?

Thanks,
KL



Dear KL:

The only person that I know for sure that has done a home-brew RP machine is Aad Van der Geest from the Netherlands. He started with an HP inkjet and modified that to print in color on top of starch or a plaster-like powder. The purported difference between his approach and Z-Corp is that the layer adhering material is within the powder bed. His original price was going to be around $7K as I recall, but since about a year ago, the development was taken over by TNO and subsequently licensed to BMT in Germany. Their intended price was around $15K and the machine made it to beta test. Aad has an EPO patent, however a patent fight with MIT resulted in the demise of the project.

You can find links to these developments on the WWGRP commercial systems pages, and possibly in the Digest area, as well.

The elusive $1K machine may come to exist at some point, but it awaits 2 things: An audience big enough to support applications that result in a massive engineering investment, and perfection of materials and technology to address those larger market segments. Remember that a $1K selling price implies a manufacturing cost of about $250 which is not a trivial exercise.

On the up side, think about what's in a VCR or a small copier. I think the technical task is on the same order so there's no inherent reason why it cannot be done. Ask first: What market would support that investment?


There's been considerable thinking about this, at any rate, by a group at Harvard and by Koshnevis at Univ of Southern CA. Both groups have written quite a bit about such applications, although the approaches are more like FDM with big trowels and robotic heads. This avoids having to remove a large powder bed, or getting it rained on and having it harden into a mass. Koshnevis calls his approach "Contour Crafting" and he has a number of patents. There are other groups working on structures such as sailing vessels, etc.

Look at the Univ listings on the WWGRP to uncover more info; also on the art/architecture pages and in the bibliography.

These are good questions to pose to the RPML. They come up periodically there with an ensuing storm of replies, but that's good - They should! Consider being an instigator.

Best regards,

Ed Grenda
Castle Island Co.



Dear Ed,

Thank you for taking the time to write such thoughtful and adequate responses.

Regards,
KL

 


Home | Products | RP Directory | Service Bureau Directory | RP Patents | RP Publications | Contact us

(C) Copyright Castle Island Co., All Rights Reserved.
REV 0 - - - 4/5/06