|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe The number of European and Israeli companies providing additive fabrication technologies is now greater than the number of US companies doing so, although much of the work is still in early commercialization stages. The companies and technologies discussed below are among the more active. In the last few years, integrated efforts to develop and promote additive technologies have been undertaken by the European community. The research programs include both academic and commercial organizations in many countries with much emphasis placed on rapid manufacturing applications. Extensive information is available from the World Technology Evaluation Center (WTEC), a US government-sponsored initiative, which has been conducting an assessment. An additional source of information for many European technologies and companies not discussed here is the section on Rapid Tooling. You can also use the links in the commercial systems directory pages to find out more.
In early 2003, the company challenged 3D Systems exclusive US market for selective laser sintering systems by installing machines at two US service bureaus. It was yet another salvo in the rancorous disputes between the companies ranging over patents and other matters. At the beginning of 2004, EOS and 3D reached agreement to cross license intellectual property and settle all outstanding disagreements. 3D Systems also agreed to start selling some EOS products on an OEM basis in the US. EOS has placed much emphasis over the years on rapid manufacturing and tooling applications for its machinery. The effort has been increasingly successful as RM has become more recognized by many industries. The company has also been working with German laser and machine tool producer Trumph GmbH to extend its SLS technology to selective laser melting. SLM is similar to selective laser sintering, but produces fully-dense parts. Trumph, in turn, is also working with the US company POM-Group on the machinery aspects of that company's laser powder forming technology. There is an interesting possibility of future convergence among these players. While EOS's revenue growth has slowed in the last couple of years, it's compound growth rate was on the order of 22% for the several preceding years. With its focus on small series production, the company could once again experience increasing revenue as additive manufacturing becomes more widely adopted. The company also faces increasing competition from other system manufacturers providing similar powder-based technologies. In addition to Arcam AB and MTT Technologies Group, described below, Concept-Laser GmbH (Germany) and Phenix Systems (France) are among others that offer products with unique specifications to address specific market segments.
In January, 2008 the company announced plans to directly market its products in the US after its agreement with Stratasys came to an end.
![]()
The limitation of a relatively small build envelope of the original machines has been overcome by the introduction of the PerfactoryXede® in late 2007. Not only does this machine have a build volume of 600 x 500 x 500 mm, but it's said to be capable of building at 20 mm per hour with 50 micron resolution in the Z-axis. Another interesting aspect of this machine is that unlike other additive technologies it doesn't actually build in discrete layers. Instead, it uses continuous motion of the build platform which means that the parts it produces really are "grown." The company also produces the BioplotterTM, a system to build 3D scaffolds for tissue engineering applications. This machine is based on hypodermic dispensing of a curing material into a liquid medium.
![]()
Fockele & Schwarze (Germany) started as a stereolithography technology provider but now produces such systems largely for research applications. It was first to commercialize the selective laser melting (SLM) process developed at the Fraunhofer Institute. The technology is now sold by MTT Technologies Group (UK), a spin-out from the German company MCP-HEK Tooling GmbH which had in-turn taken over commercialization of the technology from F&S. Smaller SLM systems aimed at dental, jewelry and similar applications that require small, intricate parts were introduced in 2006. The systems operate with a wide range of materials including: stainless steel, titanium, tool steel, tantalum, cobalt chrome, inconel and many other non-ferrous materials. In early 2008, 3D Systems announced plans to market the equipment in the US.
  ![]()
A variety of steels, Inconel, and reactive materials such as aluminum and titanium can be used, depending on the specific machine within the company's product range. A multi-functional machine called the M3 has individual replaceable modules that perform either selective laser melting, laser erosion or laser marking. CONCEPT aims its products largely at the market for injection mold tooling and similar applications, and has built up an installed base now approaching 100 machines largely concentrated in Europe.
fcubic AB (Sweden) is developing an inkjet-based production system for manufacturing small stainless steel parts. Currently fcubic is operating as a service bureau. Parts are typically 2 to 25mm, and can be manufactured in volumes of one or two thousand per day. The goal is to eventually license turnkey systems for high-volume production systems capable of 10,000 parts per day for parts fitting within a 10mm cube.
Materialise NV (Belgium) is an RP software producer which also provides service bureau functions in several countries, as well as proprietary stereolithography technology. It claims to have the largest service bureau capacity in Europe. The company's MammothTM stereolithography systems can fabricate an entire automobile dashboard as a single piece. A description of the Mammoth is available in this article. Materialise is probably the single largest commercial entity in the entire field of additive fabrication. It employs more than 700 people in its four divisions, roughly as many as systems market leaders 3D Systems and Stratasys combined. It has leveraged its expertise in rapid prototyping software to become a force in medical, dental and surgical software and simulation, as well. It was not the miners that profited the most from the Gold Rush. It was the companies that sold them the shovels. In this way Materialise has quietly become the biggest fish in the additive fabrication pond.
Mcor Technologies (Ireland) has developed an additive fabrication method based on laminated object manufacturing (LOM). It shares some characteristics with Cubic Technologies LOM systems which have been available for more than 20 years, described above. However, Mcor's method is closer to Kira Corp.'s PLT and uses a cutting blade rather than a laser. It also uses selective bonding of standard A4 sheet paper stock which is said to result in easy removal of support volumes. The initial machine, dubbed the Matrix, was introduced in the UK at the end of 2008 at a selling price in the range of US$34,000. While this is a price that is quite a bit higher than most of its expected direct competitors, Mcor is counting heavily on the very low cost of its consumables. The company has indicated it will initiate US sales in 2009.
Sintermask GmbH (Germany) (formerly Speed Part RP AB of Sweden) was taken over by FIT GmbH, a German service bureau and technology provider, in 2008. The company is continuing the development of selective mask sintering technology (SMS) which has been in beta test for several years. This powder layer-based technology is said to be both much faster and much less expensive than selective laser sintering which it resembles. Instead of a laser, exposure is by means of a high-resolution temporary mask on a transparent plate created using a xerographic process. The technology is aimed at rapid manufacturing applications for polymer parts. More about the technology can be learned from this introductory article. FIT expects to introduce a second generation system, dubbed the ZORRO, in 2010. The 300 x 200 x 800mm [12 x 8 x 31 in] (x, y, z) build chamber is said to be capable of being processed in a single 8 hour shift to make as many as 3,000 thumb-sized parts. The company says this is equivalent to a build time of just 10 seconds per part with a resolution of just over 0.001 inches in x-y, and about 0.004 inches for the z-direction.
Israel
The company purchased the early Israeli RP market entrant Cubital's patent portfolio in 2001 as a defensive measure. Scitex Corp. has been a major investor in both companies. In late 2003, 3D Systems started selling a similar photopolymer-based inkjet system called the InVisionTM. It was originally positioned against Objet's products, but the company quickly reduced the price to be more competitive in the 3D printer segment. Objet's line combines convenience and office-friendly operation with output closely resembling or even exceeding that from stereolithography machines.
While Objet aims the machine mainly at applications that take advantage of the different and varying properties available from the materials, the fact that they are also of contrasting opacity and color has also enabled the machine to get a toehold in medical applications, as well. This makes it possible to show structures within the body for surgical planning, for example. Objet's latest offering is the Alaris30, launched in October, 2008. It's a desktop machine priced at less than $40,000. It may offer some strong competition to machines from Stratasys' Fortus range as well as 3D's stereolithography systems. If Objet makes a material available for the machine that's appropriate for casting, it might also take a bite out of Solidscape and Envisiontec machines aimed at high-resolution applications such as jewelry or medical implants. Those customers might be able to save $20,000 or more with the Alaris. While it doesn't offer quite the fine layers of some of Objet's systems or the competitors, its 28 micron spec is probably good enough for many such applications.
Japan
Japanese companies have largely concentrated on building and improving several variants of stereolithography processes and there are at least five companies working in this area. The Japanese are also concentrating on the development of photopolymer materials for the process with a number of unique approaches and products. However, because of legal restrictions on ingredients, these photopolymers often may not be sold in markets outside of Japan. Small desktop stereolithography systems are available in Japan for as little as $10,000.
As part of 3D Systems' settlement of the US government's anti-trust suit, Sony was chosen as the licensee of 3D's stereolithography-based intellectual property and allowed to compete in the US market. Sony introduced a line of stereolithography equipment to the US market in May, 2003, but the company failed to make inroads and discontinued its US operations in 2006.
Not all activity in Japan is based on stereolithography: Toyoda Machine Works was Helisys' Japanese licensee and continues to manufacture LOM systems. Kira also makes a paper-based LOM system, but uses a laser printer to deposit adhesive selectively to layers and cuts paper with a guided knife blade as opposed to a laser. Kira has sold a few systems in Europe and the US. In June 2006, Kira introduced a second generation machine, the Katana PLT-20 RapidMockup system. The unit is priced at US$35,000 and potential advantages compared to other low-end machines are speed of fabrication and cost of materials.
Japan also produces several other unique systems which aren't widely known. For example, Afit Corp. has developed laser printer-based rapid prototyping. The technology has the long-term potential to offer fast, high resolution systems that can utilize a wide range of materials.
You can use the links in the Commercial RP Systems directory pages to learn more about activity in Japan.
China
Korea
Singapore |
From Here...
Tsinghua University, Center for Laser Rapid Forming The University is one of the major factors behind China's RP efforts. Also visit the University's RP Key Laboratory web-site.
Rapid Prototyping in Europe and Japan. This is still an excellent overview even though it's getting a little long in the tooth.
System Manufacturers.
What is a 3D Printer?
