Conjectures

This model is weak because so much of its based on conjecture. The derivation of mass is based on special relativity formulas and is internally consistent. But one must start with the assumption that the result and interpretation are valid. There isn't a way to prove this model except by use of Occam's razor. This model is internally consistent and consistent with as much of physics that I know. It has an element of beauty and brings together many disparate ideas in physics.

The only thing that I can think that would prove this model is a solution of Schroedinger equation for a torus topology with the proper dimensions. But that is the catch. Just like in QED, where one must have all the paths included, one must solve the equation with all of the dimensions. Assuming the smaller dimensions are zero, when they are not, simplifies the solution but adds an error. The real benefit may be in assuming the dimensions sizes for fitting the solution to the electron. The resulting sizes then make it possible to solve for other particles.

The model's number of dimensions is based on Hyperspace, by Kaku. That the some microspaces are exactly the same size is based on the symmetry of gravity in normal space.

This whole theory is basically written descriptively. This is another weakness. Though at this point it doesn't lead to anything new since it uses existing Special Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, and general relativity formulas. The lack of derivations and solutions stems from not being trained in the needed mathematical techniques. I didn't even know which math I would need until after making the key conceptual breakthrough, momentum defines mass instead of the other way around. Now what I would like to take is a class in topology, set theory, and solving a wave equation on non-spherical microdimensions. I would also take math theory on 26 dimension spaces.