I've always liked the look of trestles, wood or steel, so it's always in the back of my mind when I'm designing a track plan. I don't remember exactly when I included the trestle when I was sketching the plan out, but having the highest track in the middle of the three on a fill would be visually awkward. It would make the center of the layout seem like it's in the middle of a "bowl", and block some of the views to the interior of the layout from the primary viewing position (whether the layout was in a coffee table, or in a corner). A low trestle in that location opened it up, make it seem less confined, and I get to include a long trestle on my small layout.
I wanted to have a more modern steel trestle than a wood one, so I naturally chose to use Micro Engineering's bridge pieces. I used the thinner, shorter 40' bridge sections, and avoided using any of the 80' sections, as they would seem rather overbearing on a small layout with short cars and engines. Using all 40' sections would also allow me to make the trestle look more "spidery". Once the subroadbed was completed, I had the actual length of the trestle. Of course, it wasn't a fit for full 40' sections, and the creek required a slightly longer span, but I only had to modify two sections. The picture below shows a standard assembled 40' span in the middle, with the longer 50' span to cross the creek to the left, and the 25' foot span for the West end of the bridge on the right.