On small vessels does a line really have to belay to a pin? What about cleats, especially shroud cleats. About 10 years ago my wife and took a holiday up on Georgian Bay and visited Penetanguishene, Ontario. There they have a privately run historical tourist attraction called "The Historic Naval and Military Establishment". This, on the site of the old Royal Naval Base and Military Headquarters for HM Forces during the latter part of the 18th Century. On the site was an old building which house a treasure throve of artifacts consisting of ships rigging gear, tools, etc. all of the period. There were dozens of shroud cleats on hand and partially hewn bitt heads. All acceptable substitutes for belaying pins.
Some years ago Chapelle and I were discussing belaying points on small vessels such as schooners and the like and he indicated that at times it was not uncommon to take a line around the base of a deadeye. As long as it would hold and could easily be let go was his only criteria.
As far as more than one line to a single pin I have always heard that
that is entirely OK and the rule I have been following is related lines
are OK for a common pin. That is to say a bunt line and a clew line
for the same sail could be put on the same pin. It stands to reason
that when the buntline was let go, the clew would be also.
{Dana L. McCalip}
Some old full-rigged ship models I have repaired clearly have some lines "attached" to the shrouds.
Boy, it sure would be nice to have some clear plans for each basic
kind of vessel...at least for schooners and ships. Couldn't some
basic rules of thumb and a generic plan for each type be presented?
{David Blanchard}
Steel's Elements of Masting, Rigging and Sail Making 1794 edition mentions wood and iron belaying pins and the use of shroud racks but does not mention the size of ships they were used in. An interesting note is that Steel describes iron belaying pins as being tapered from the middle towards each end and driven into boards, called racks. Taken literally, this sounds like a different shape then what we are used to seeing. (This is my own comment)
Keep in mind that all of this refers to English practice and one is left
in the dark about American or continental European practice. It might
be almost safe to assume that American practice could be somewhat
similar, given no other information being available.
{Dana McCalip}
I can understand how difficult it would be to bend on a new sail with lines doubled up on pins. That operation, however, is somewhat unusual, and doesn't directly relate to day-to-day sail handling operations. EAGLE has a pin for every line, but in a pinch, we could have gotten by with some lines doubled up, such as the buntlines on the royals, t'gallants, and topsails.
Obviously, certain lines (halyards, lifts, sheets) would need their own pins to be accessible during normal and emergency operations. Tending the bunts and clewlines while setting sail, for example, is a fairly simple task. All you need to do is ensure that the lines run freely, and don't foul in the blocks.
When setting the royal or t'gallant for example, one person would handle the 3 lines on the port pinrail (bunt,bunt,clew) and another would handle the stbd side. This freed up everyone else to help on the halyard, where they were needed when trying to set the sail with just the 10-12 man watch section.
So, while modern practice does not necessarily mean anything when
looking at period ships, I do believe that certain lines could have
been doubled up on pins and still handled safely.
{Bill Michaels}
The problem with a generic plan is that you may illustrate it with enough pins, then when you do your ship which has less pins you are stuck again. There are some plans around in books and NRG that give you a general idea. NRG shop notes has the Constitution and I think a whaler. For fishing schooners you have Chapelle, so there are those, but as I said I still get lost on a particular ship. Out of necessity I have to belay a line where it probably should not go, but what do you do when all the other pins are used up. I try to juggle back and forth but this changing drives you crazy.
I made a mistake. I meant to say topsail sheets. They do come down
to the fife rail or could go outboard. The point I was trying to make is
that if you belay the sheets on the forward cross bar at foremast, and
then must belay to the side rail at main since there is no forward rail
then you have a difference in the location at fore and main masts.
{Ben Langford}
Back?