[Company Logo Image]

User Comments
Product Info
2D or 3D?
White Paper
Smile Article
Q&A
Place an Order
Support
Contact Info
About Us

2D or 3D Imaging?

AlterImage makes the finest 2D aesthetic simulation available. But if you are confused in deciding between AlterImage’s 2D imaging or the 3D imaging offered by other vendors, here are some things to consider: 

bullet

Advantages of 3D imaging may include:
bullet

The ability to visualize the effect of specific implant sizes.

bullet

The ability to calculate an implant size to match a simulation.

bullet

The ability to obtain measurements in 3 dimensions.

 

bullet

Advantages of 2D imaging:
bullet

2D imaging is much simpler, faster, and easier than 3D imaging.

bullet

2D simulation is far easier and much more flexible than 3D imaging. With 2D simulation, you can make any kind of simulation you want. With 3D simulation, you are limited to the domain-specific tools that come with the 3D software.

bullet

2D imaging requires no dedicated space. Many AlterImage users take a digital image of the patient right in the consultation room.

bullet

2D imaging is much less expensive, anywhere from about 1/10th the price to 1/100th the price of 3D imaging.

 

bullet

2D medical imaging can be done with any kind of digital camera. But 3D medical imaging requires the use of a sophisticated dual-camera setup or a separate pattern projection system. Inexpensive single-camera 3D is too inaccurate for medical use.

In summary, for most aesthetic physicians, 2D imaging will meet your needs in the most cost-effective way. We expect that in the future, aesthetic physicians will continue to use 2D imaging for the majority of their patients but some aesthetic physicians may also use 3D imaging for special cases.

(2D means “2 dimensional” and 3D means “3 dimensional”. A conventional digital camera produces 2D images.)

Home Feedback Contents

Send mail to webmaster@SeattleSoftwareDesign.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1999-2007 Seattle Software Design, Inc.
Last modified: November 26, 2008