
times since the counter was installed.
NOTE: Page size is limited by HTML to some 30kB; thus, I am
forced to separate this page
out from the main schnabel page and from the continuation page 0 and previous
page
as a continuation page.
NOTE: I regret that some of my internal links refuse to work; if they don't, please click "Back" and scroll.
Something has to lift these giant loads; see Big Cranes.
Jump to SB,III's RAILROAD Page for a goodly set of RR links
and to SB,III's MODEL RAILROAD Page for a goodly set of model RR links (yea, verily, forsooth!).
If this subject interests you, you must also see Tom Daspit's site, linked below!
* - Spelling of the Name: SCHNABEL vs. SCHNABLE -
"Schnabel" is the KORREKT spelling! It is the German word for "beak",
which I originally thought referred to the beak-shaped loading arms, but now know
was the name of the German inventor of the design ca. 1930 or so. I don't
know where or when I started using "Schnable", but it was
wrong and I don't mind admitting my error.
In Jan 2002, I noted (on page 2) that Trix, now the HO two-rail and N arm of Märklin, had just come out with the 1973 DB type Uai 839 32-axle (8-truck) Schnabel Transport Car {Schwerlasttransportwagen}, their #T23994, decorated for Era IV. The length over buffers is 28-3/8" (72cm)! and is the largest HO freight car to date from Trix (which also just produced the Big Boy in HO two-rail). It comes with a "trafo" load and the center wheel sets on the trucks are sprung. The load was said to be mounted on the car with side play as in the prototype but the car can also be used close-coupled (without the load); it was announced as being produced in a one-time series only in 2001. And here, by special courtesy of Märklin USA, she is:

Märklin brought the 8-truck Uai 839 out again in HO (in DB Cargo red) as their #48295:

Well, on 11 Jul 05 on my return from a trip to Texas and Ohio, I found a message from my hobby dealer that my special order Trix #T24020 HO two-rail (insulated-axle version of Märklin) Uai 839 32-axle Schnable was in. I picked it up the very next evening; a real budget buster but I HAD to have it. I'd already gotten the paired 28-axle dual Scheurle LS-250 road tractor set, the "Heuler" ("Howler") in DB Cargo red, Märklin #18820. Unprototypically, they share the load arms, not just the load.
I got in quite late and, of course, had to set it up immediately. Oh, my Gawd! Not having a conversion coupler, I used a slow beast to push it around my club-sized layout (½ scale mile once around), with great care and trepidation lest it foul anything. No way, Hose A; it tracked smoothly and effortlessly AND even cleared neatly between rolling stock on adjacent curved tracks in most cases and aced #8 and even #6 turnouts. The very next day, I set up an ersatz #4 crossover (no such on my layout!) and it ran through that as if it was on tangent track.
In spite of very-severe sticker shock, I am quite thrilled with the monster (it is dwarfed, however, by my mockup of CEBX 800).
On 18 Jul 05, I finally got around to taking photos of all this; let's begin with the UIA 839 sitting in front of the CEBX 800 mockup and behind the LS-250 pair and a yardstick (36") for size copmparison:



(18 Jul 05 photos by and © Copyright 2005 S. Berliner, III - all rights reserved)
I was a bit dismayed to find that both the Märklin LS-250s and the Trix T24020 are made in China; so much for Göppingen's vaunted quality (not to mention a wee bit of misrepresentation)! Both are magnificently done but the LS-250 comes with a small bag of parts and no instructions; the Schnabel has a small pamphlet with grossly inadequate captioning. I scanned the illustrations for general interest and captioned them better (sez I):


Place the load and load arms on the car halves.
[What the instructions do NOT tell is how to safely pull the load arms off the railcar or tractor - see below.]

How to shift the load laterally (just push the outer ends of the load arms).

How to remove the NEM 362 couplers and put on the incredibly-finely-detailed
display parts (since the couplers were NOT mounted, this gave me pause).

How to pull the pins to remove the load (they neglected to mention
that they are next to impossible to yank out).

How to split the load arms (since they are strongly spring-loaded,
perhaps this should be a warning, instead) and stow the hydraulics.

How to squeeze the laod arms inward for light travel (this would be fine except
that the pin friction doesn't overcome the spring loading and they fly apart).

[Thumbnailed picture; click on image for larger picture]
How to emplace the travel buffer (sorry, it doesn't stay in place nohow
on the arms
when on the LS-250 tractors and only delicately when on the Uai 839 railcar).

[Thumbnailed picture; click on image for larger picture]
How to fit the travel locks (they go in easily enough, once you get the hang of it,
but they are well-nigh impossible to remove - I had to resort to using
micro-needlenose pliers).
[To pop the load arms out of the sockets in order to transfer the arms from the railcars to the trucks and back, I made a very thin "pry bar" (like a chisel/Meißel) and very gently but firmly pry the arms upwards while rocking them slightly. If you do it often, then I suggest rounding the restraining lip on the pins ever so slightly.]My Kadee #17 conversion couplers came in 22 Jul 05 and were an easy substitution; oh my, oh my, how sweet it is! That car just glides so smoothly! So, naturally, I coupled up all my operable Schnabels and the string stretched out almost to infinity, some 14', and the DDP-45 made a valiant attempt to pull it all but popped a 2½ amp breaker on the first curve. Then, just for laughs, I added the CEBX 800 and WECX {something@} tracking mock-ups, stringing the string out to 19'!!! Not only is that string every bit as long as it is improbable, it also caused the poor old DDP-45 to pop the breaker after only a few feet on tangent track! Well, mostly tangent; I don't have any stretch of tangent track 19' long (nor should I, unless I were modeling Australia's Nullarbor (Treeless) Plain).(05 Jun 08)
@ - Now then, just what did I model? The wood mockup shown on the first Schnabel page is definitely NOT WECX 102/301, although the scale drawing I made so long ago equally-definitely is! WECX 102/301's 22 axles/44 wheels are arranged as (6-6)+(4-6)+(6-4)+(6-6), whereas the model, built to some mysterious plan, is very clearly set up as [(6-6)+(6-4)]+[(4-6)+(6-6)] - the inner span bolster will not fit if reversed. To clarify the model's undercarriage; here it is again, artificially lightened:

There are at least two variations of the Trix Uai 839 (#T23994 in gray/green and #T24020 in Cargo Red); they also have a "smaller" 6-truck 24-axle unit, Uaai 838, Trix #T24019, with what appears to be a huge stationary or marine diesel engine load. Here it is in two variations (which may be nothing more than a pilot model photo and a production photo, or two scales):

(Photos courtesy of and © Märklin USA by special written permission 25 Jan 2002 - all rights reserved)
In HO, per Trix, both the Uaai 838 and Uai 839 models can share the same trafo load; no wonder the trafo looks undersized for the Uai 839!
Well, I couldn't find a Trix T24019 and Trix came out with the car in Cargo Red with an automobile body stamping die base for a load and I sprang for it instead. It came in on 06 Dec 2005 and I picked it up, popped in the Kadee #17 conversion couplers, figured out how to fit the load (not easy if one tries to follow the inadequate instructions), got all 24 wheelsets on the rails (not all that difficult, actually), and she scoons (all 23"/56cm of her)! Here she is in front of the 32-axle Uai 239 T24020:

(08 Dec 2005 photos by and © 2005 S. Berliner, III - all rights reserved)
Then I took a shot to show the car without the load, with the heavy longitudinal girders and small transverse girders (orange) and the load shown separately:

On tangent track (from left to right - full left shift, half left shift, and no shift):

However, at one point several circuits later (I know - I was pushing my luck!), my old Overland/Ajin brass WECX 203 derailed its lead truck from the strain and snagged a tie; the Uai 239 thereupon pulled apart (a load arm pulled right out of its main span bolster), but there was no damage, so I can laugh about it!
The T24338 Uaai 838 Schnabel model has an even smaller pamphlet, with only three illustrations, again with grossly inadequate captioning. The first illustration, how to swap couplers and end detail, is almost identical to the one for the T24020, the third, lateral shifting, IS the same as for the T24020 (with one detail of the load omitted, even though the loads are totally different!), and the second, placing the load on the girders and the load arms on the car halves, has the 16-axle car halves underneath (!!!):

To contact S. Berliner, III, please click here.

of this series of Schnabel Railroad Car pages.
Return to Top of Page