The Goal of The Universe
by A. P. Knoch(1)
INTRODUCTION
THE BIBLE is confidently appealed to support three entirely different
views of God's ultimate goal for the creatures of His hand and heart. Almost
all agree in the main that the believer, who trusts alone in the blood
of Christ, is certain of lasting bliss. But those who do not believe--
what is their destiny? Many insist that they will be tormented forever,
others say that they will cease to exist while some believe that they,
also will eventually be saved. All bring forward texts from the Bible.
In each class are earnest, consecrated Christians who desire to know the
truth and to live it out.
If
it were to be decided by a majority vote, eternal torment would be true.
But the Scriptures speak of the present as a time of apostasy, so that
the majority are more likely to be wrong. If it were left to history,
the early Greek fathers seem to have held mostly to annihilation of the
wicked or the salvation of all, and they used the language of inspiration
and were nearer to its source than we are. But the only satisfactory
way is to base our faith directly on the inspired Word of God. We must
test and see what support it gives to each of these teachings.
Teachers of eternal torment find quite a few strong texts in the Bible.
Perhaps the principal one is the phrase "everlasting punishment" in Matthew
25:46, because it occurs in contrast to "eternal life. As everlasting
and eternal are the same word in the Greek, these teachers rightly
infer that the punishment must have the same duration as the life. As this
same phrase "eternal life" is often used of the believer, there seems no
doubt that the punishment is endless.
Another passage which seems equally strong is "tormented day and night
forever and ever," (Rev. 20:10) connected with "God, Who liveth
forever
and ever." (Rev. 15:7). Here again, they reason, God's life is
endless, hence the torment can have no time limit. Admitting the translations
to be correct, and leaving other passages out of consideration, this is
enough to prove clearly that the Adversary (the devil) and the wild beast
and the false prophet (who are the only ones in view) will suffer eternal
torment.
Those who hold to annihilation do not dispute the endlessness of the sinner's
doom, but point out that it is not everlasting punishing, but punishment,
that is, it does not consist in tormenting, but in death, in which there
is no sensation. They rightly claim that man is mortal, and that there
is no immortality outside of Christ. For them the second death is
the practical extinction of those who are cast into the lake of fire.
The Universalists, apparently, do not rely much on scriptural evidence,
so we will not consider them here, but rather those who base their belief
in universal reconciliation on the Scriptures. These claim that "everlasting
punishment" is a mistranslation, and should read "eonian [or age long]
chastening," that it applies to only a few at a particular time, and does
not deal with their final fate at all, that they will be judged for their
acts, and after that suffer the second death, and only thereafter will
they be made alive and reconciled. They say that, by leaving every passage
in its place, and interpreting it as of the time and persons to which it
refers, it is possible to believe all the Scriptures, for the conflict
vanishes when the process is kept distinct from the result, the
way from the goal.
The
principal passages they produce to prove that all will be saved and justified
and made alive and reconciled are: "our Saviour God, Who wills that all
mankind be saved and come into a realization of the truth" (1 Tim. 2: 3,
4); "We rely on the living God, Who is the Saviour of all mankind,
especially of believers" (1 Tim. 4:10); " . . . as it was through one offense
for all mankind for condemnation, thus also it is through one just award
for all mankind, for life's justifying" (Rom. 5:18); "Even as, in
Adam, all are dying, thus also, in Christ, shall all be vivified," (1 Cor.
15:22) ". . . through Him to reconcile all to Him (making peace through
the blood of His cross), through Him, whether those on earth or those
in the heavens;" ( Col. 1:20) and the statement which supplies the title
to this book,". . . .that God may be All in All.'' (1 Corth. 15:28).
These passages, it is claimed, really deal with the final state, while
the other passages, such as "everlasting punishment," and "torment for
ever and ever," are concerned with intermediate matters. It will be seen
from this that both eternal torment and annihilation fail to explain all
the passages, especially those last quoted, but that the believer in universal
reconciliation claims to do so. This is based mainly on his contention
that the words eternal, everlasting, for ever, for ever and ever, etc.,
are limited time periods and should be so translated.
Upon the pages of current translations of God's Word there is an irreconcilable
conflict between eternal sin and universal righteousness, eternal death
and universal vivification, eternal punishment and universal reconciliation.
If sin and death and judgment are eternal, then righteousness and resurrection
and reconciliation cannot be universal. The translations must be
wrong and a study of the doctrine of the eons shows that the eternity of
evil is unfounded and fatuous and false. As the following pages seek
to show, God is not ground under the heels of Fate but serenely guides
the universe with a strong and steady hand to it grand and glorious goal.
The subject is considered from two sides, God's assertions and human asseverations,
and, as always, God is true and man is found a liar.
Let it be clear that we are not seeking to displace the Word of God or
any portion of it by a new "system" or theology. We know that no
present system will stand the test of all the Word of God. The difficulty
lies deeper-- it is in faulty translations of that Word itself. By
correcting these misleading renderings the discrepancies vanish as well
as the difficulties which they occasion.
Let everyone face the
issue squarely. Current versions clearly teach different outcomes
of God's connection with evil. Let us put the case thus:
Universal
Everlasting
Justification
vs
Punishment
Rom. 5:18
Matt. 25:46
Universal
An Endless
Vivification
vs
Death State
1 Cor. 15:22
Rev. 20:14
Universal
Eternal
Reconciliation vs
Torment
Col. 1:20
Rev. 20:10
There is no escaping the conviction that both views cannot be true.
The usual method has been to minimize the universality of the reconciliation.
But this cannot be done without violating the context. The real discrepancy
lies in the words "everlasting," "endless," and "eternal," which have no
equivalents in the original.
The
key to the cause, the character and consequences of sin lies in its temporary
term. If evil is eternal and death indestructible and estrangement
irreconcilable, their origin and object can never be grasped.
Their gloomy shadow stretches its interminable length upon the character
of the God Who prepared their entrance and existence, yet provided no exit
for them when they had played their part.
Faith will fall back upon God in spite of a faulty version and trust Him
to explain all in His own time; but this very same faith will force aside
all human interference when once it discovers that God Himself has already
given a sufficient and most satisfactory explanation. Faith will
exult that the bitterness of human theology has been banished and its doubts
not only dissolved, but that the God it worships is greater and grander
and more glorious that it had dared to dream.
Let
no one imagine that these pages teach a mere "restitution" to a former
state. A creation restored to its primeval condition cannot
account for the presence of evil. Sin leads to estrangement.
It brings in the breach between God and His creatures. It makes them
His enemies. God's answer to this is reconciliation, not a mere restoration
to a former condition. It is far more that. It is God's display,
by means of the dark shadows of sin, of His immanent love for His
creatures, and His way of engaging their affection.
Nor let any dream that aught of this is brought about apart from the work
of Christ. Rather let them acknowledge that it owns Him not only as the
Alpha, but also as the Omega, not only as the Origin but also as the Consummation.
The truth here set forth is based upon the blood of Christ, it depends
upon the death of God's Son, and it crowns His cross with a conquest which
adequately accords with the suffering and shame of Him Who was forsaken
for our sakes upon the accursed tree.
It is the, particular purpose of this book to examine the scriptural teaching
on the eons: hence much space (the whole of Appendix A) is devoted to an
investigation of the eonian times, and another appendix
is added to show how eon and eonian have been translated in seven selected
versions.
The subject of the eonian times is one of the most vital and interesting
which could engage the minds and hearts of those who wish to know God's
Word and His ways. Until this is thoroughly understood we are not really
ready to consider what God has to say in regard to the final outcome of
His purpose. We therefore urge everyone to study the eons carefully,
their number and character and relation to each other.
The chapters which follow are taken from UNSEARCHABLE RICHES, a magazine
devoted to original research in the Word of God.
___________________________________________
(1)Knoch,
A. E. All In All. Canyon Country, CA. Concordant Publishing Concern 1978