|
SEC. 2. FINDINGS
The Congress makes the following
findings:
(1) The economy of Cuba has experienced a decline of at
least 60 percent in the last 5 years as a result of--
.....(A) the end of its subsidization
by the former Soviet Union of between 5 billion and 6 billion dollars
...........annually;
.....(B) 36 years of communist tyranny
and economic mismanagement by the Castro government;
.....(C) the extreme decline in
trade between Cuba and the countries of the former Soviet bloc;
and
.....(D) the stated policy of the
Russian Government and the countries of the former Soviet bloc
...........to.conduct
economic relations with Cuba on strictly commercial terms.
(2) At the same time, the welfare
and health of the Cuban people have substantially deteriorated
as a result of this economic decline and the refusal of the Castro
regime to permit free and fair democratic elections in Cuba.
(3) The Castro regime has made
it abundantly clear that it will not engage in any substantive
political reforms that would lead to democracy, a market economy,
or an economic recovery.
(4) The repression of the Cuban
people, including a ban on free and fair democratic elections,
and continuing violations of fundamental human rights, have isolated
the Cuban regime as the only completely nondemocratic government
in the Western Hemisphere.
(5) As long as free elections
are not held in Cuba, the economic condition of the country and
the welfare of the Cuban people will not improve in any significant
way.
(6) The totalitarian nature of
the Castro regime has deprived the Cuban people of any peaceful
means to improve their condition and has led thousands of Cuban
citizens to risk or lose their lives in dangerous attempts to
escape from Cuba to freedom.
(7) Radio Marti and Television
Marti have both been effective vehicles for providing the people
of Cuba with news and information and have helped to bolster
the morale of the people of Cuba living under tyranny.
(8) The consistent policy of
the United States towards Cuba since the beginning of the Castro
regime, carried out by both Democratic and Republican administrations,
has sought to keep faith with the people of Cuba, and has been
effective in sanctioning the totalitarian Castro regime.
(9) The United States has shown
a deep commitment, and considers it a moral obligation, to promote
and protect human rights and fundamental freedoms as expressed
in the Charter of the United Nations and in the Universal Declaration
of Human Rights.
(10) The Congress has historically
and consistently manifested its solidarity and the solidarity
of the American people with the democratic aspirations of the
Cuban people.
(11) The Cuban Democracy Act
of 1992 calls upon the President to encourage the governments
of countries that conduct trade with Cuba to restrict their trade
and credit relations with Cuba in a manner consistent with
the purposes of that Act.
(12) Amendments to the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 made by the FREEDOM Support Act require
that the President, in providing economic assistance to Russia
and the emerging Eurasian democracies, take into account
the extent to which they are acting to "terminate support
for the communist regime in Cuba, including removal of troops,
closing military facilities, and ceasing trade subsidies and
economic, nuclear, and other assistance".
(13) The Cuban Government engages
in the illegal international narcotics trade and harbors fugitives
from justice in the United States.
(14) The Castro government threatens
international peace and security by engaging in acts of armed
subversion and terrorism such as the training and supplying of
groups dedicated to international violence.
(15) The Castro government has
utilized from its inception and continues to utilize torture
in various forms (including by psychiatry), as well as execution,
exile, confiscation, political imprisonment, and other forms
of terror and repression, as means of retaining power.
(16) Fidel Castro has defined
democratic pluralism as "pluralistic garbage" and continues
to make clear that he has no intention of tolerating the democratization
of Cuban society.
(17) The Castro government holds
innocent Cubans hostage in Cuba by no fault of the hostages themselves
solely because relatives have escaped the country.
(18) Although a signatory state
to the 1928 Inter-American Convention on Asylum and the [1966]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (which protects
the right to leave one's own country), Cuba nevertheless surrounds
embassies in its capital by armed forces to thwart the right
of its citizens to seek asylum and systematically denies that
right to the Cuban people, punishing them by imprisonment for
seeking to leave the country and killing them for attempting
to do so (as demonstrated in the case of the confirmed murder
of over 40 men, women, and children who were seeking to leave
Cuba on July 13, 1994).
(19) The Castro government continues
to utilize blackmail, such as the immigration crisis with which
it threatened the United States in the summer of 1994, and other
unacceptable and illegal forms of conduct to influence the actions
of sovereign states in the Western Hemisphere in violation of
the Charter of the Organization of American States and other
international agreements and international law.
(20) The United Nations Commission
on Human Rights has repeatedly reported on the unacceptable human
rights situation in Cuba and has taken the extraordinary step
of appointing a Special Rapporteur.
(21) The Cuban Government has
consistently refused access to the Special Rapporteur and formally
expressed its decision not to "implement so much as one
comma" of the United Nations Resolutions appointing the
Rapporteur.
(22) The United Nations General
Assembly passed Resolution 47-139 on December 18, 1992, Resolution
48-142 on December 20, 1993, and Resolution 49-200 on December
23, 1994, referencing the Special Rapporteur's reports to the
United Nations and condemning violations of human rights and
fundamental freedoms in Cuba.
(23) Article 39 of Chapter
VII of the United Nations Charter provides that the
United Nations Security Council "shall determine the existence
of any threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression
and shall make recommendations, or decide what measures shall
be taken ..., to maintain or restore international peace and
security.".
(24) The United Nations has determined
that massive and systematic violations of human rights may constitute
a "threat to peace" under Article 39 and has imposed
sanctions due to such violations of human rights in the cases
of Rhodesia, South Africa, Iraq, and the former Yugoslavia.
(25) In the case of Haiti, a
neighbor of Cuba not as close to the United States as Cuba, the
United States led an effort to obtain and did obtain a United
Nations Security Council embargo and blockade against that country
due to the existence of a military dictatorship in power less
than 3 years.
(26) United Nations Security
Council Resolution 940 of July 31, 1994, subsequently authorized
the use of "all necessary means" to restore the "democratically
elected government of Haiti", and the democratically elected
government of Haiti was restored to power on October 15, 1994.
(27) The Cuban people deserve
to be assisted in a decisive manner to end the tyranny that has
oppressed them for 36 years, and the continued failure to do
so constitutes ethically improper conduct by the international
community.
(28) For the past 36 years, the
Cuban Government has posed and continues to pose a national
security threat to the United States.
............................................................................***
SEC. 3. PURPOSES
The purposes of this Act are--
(1) to assist the Cuban people in regaining their freedom
and prosperity, as well as in joining the community of democratic
countries that are flourishing in the Western Hemisphere;
(2) to strengthen international
sanctions against the Castro government;
(3) to provide for the continued
national security of the United States in the face of continuing
threats from the Castro government of terrorism, theft of property
from United States nationals by the Castro government, and the
political manipulation by the Castro government of the desire
of Cubans to escape that results in mass migration to the United
States;
(4) to encourage the holding
of free and fair democratic elections in Cuba, conducted under
the supervision of internationally recognized observers;
(5) to provide a policy framework
for United States support to the Cuban people in response to
the formation of a transition government or a democratically
elected government in Cuba; and
(6) to protect United States
nationals against confiscatory takings and the wrongful trafficking
in property confiscated by the Castro regime.
.........................................................................***
SEC. 101. STATEMENT OF POLICY
It is the sense of the Congress
that--
(1) the acts of the Castro government, including its massive,
systematic, and extraordinary violations of human rights, are
a threat to international peace;
(2) the President should
advocate, and should instruct the United States Permanent Representative
to the United Nations to propose and seek within the Security
Council, a mandatory international embargo against
the totalitarian Cuban Government pursuant to chapter VII of
the Charter of the United Nations, employing efforts similar
to consultations conducted by United States representatives with
respect to Haiti;
(3) any resumption of efforts
by any independent state of the former Soviet Union to make operational
any nuclear facilities in Cuba, and any continuation of intelligence
activities by such a state from Cuba that are targeted at the
United States and its citizens will have a detrimental impact
on United States assistance to such state; and
(4) in view of the threat to
the national security posed by the operation of any nuclear facility,
and the Castro government's continuing blackmail to unleash another
wave of Cuban refugees fleeing from Castro's oppression, most
of whom find their way to United States shores, further depleting
limited humanitarian and other resources of the United States,
the President should do all in his power to make it clear to
the Cuban Government that--
.....(A)
the completion and operation of any nuclear power facility, or
.....(B)
any further political manipulation of the desire of Cubans to
escape that results in mass
migration to the United States, will be considered an act of
aggression which will be met with an appropriate response in
order to maintain the security of the national borders of the
United States and the health and safety of the American people.
.........................................................................***
SEC. 207. SETTLEMENT OF OUTSTANDING
UNITED STATES CLAIMS TO CONFISCATED PROPERTY IN CUBA
(a) REPORT TO CONGRESS.--Not
later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act,
the Secretary of State shall provide a report to the appropriate
congressional committees containing an assessment of the property
dispute question in Cuba, including--
.....(1)
an estimate of the number and amount of claims to property confiscated
by the Cuban Government that are
held by United States nationals in addition to those claims certified
under.section 507 of the International
Claims Settlement Act of 1949;
.....(2)
an assessment of the significance of promptly resolving confiscated
property claims to the.revitalization
of the Cuban economy;
.....(3)
a review and evaluation of technical and other assistance that
the United States could provide to help
either a transition government in Cuba or a democratically elected
government in Cuba.establish mechanisms
to resolve property questions;
.....(4)
an assessment of the role and types of support the United States
could provide to help resolve claims
to property confiscated by the Cuban Government that are held
by United States nationals who did not receive or qualify for
certification under section 507 of the International Claims Settlement
Act of 1949; and
.....(5)
an assessment of any areas requiring legislative review or action
regarding the resolution of.property
claims in Cuba prior to a change of government in Cuba.
.......................................................................***
(d) SENSE OF CONGRESS.--It
is the sense of the Congress that the satisfactory resolution
of property claims by a Cuban Government recognized by the United
States remains an essential condition for the full resumption
of economic and diplomatic relations between the United States
and Cuba.
TITLE III--PROTECTION OF PROPERTY
RIGHTS OF UNITED STATES NATIONALS (22
USCA Sec. 6081)
SEC. 301. FINDINGS.
The Congress makes the following findings:
(1) Individuals enjoy a fundamental
right to own and enjoy property which is enshrined in the United
States Constitution.
(2) The wrongful confiscation or
taking of property belonging to United States nationals by the
Cuban Government, and the subsequent exploitation of this property
at the expense of the rightful owner, undermines the comity of
nations, the free flow of commerce, and economic development.
(3) Since Fidel Castro seized power
in Cuba in 1959--
(A) he has trampled on the fundamental
rights of the Cuban people; and
(B) through his personal despotism,
he has confiscated the property of--
...............(i)
millions of his own citizens;
..............(ii)
thousands of United States nationals; and
..............(iii)
thousands more Cubans who claimed asylum in the United States
as refugees because ...................of.persecution and later became naturalized
citizens of the United States.
(4) It is in the interest of
the Cuban people that the Cuban Government respect equally the
property rights of Cuban nationals and nationals of other countries.
(5) The Cuban Government is
offering foreign investors the opportunity to purchase an equity
interest in, manage, or enter into joint ventures using property
and assets some of which were confiscated from United States
nationals.
(6) This "trafficking"
in confiscated property provides badly needed financial benefit,
including hard currency, oil, and productive investment and expertise,
to the current Cuban Government and thus undermines the foreign
policy of the United States--
.....(A)
to bring democratic institutions to Cuba through
the pressure of a general economic embargo at a time when
the Castro regime has proven to be vulnerable to international
economic pressure; and
.....(B)
to protect the claims of United States nationals who had property
wrongfully confiscated by the.Cuban
Government.
(7) The United States Department
of State has notified other governments that the transfer to
third parties of properties confiscated by the Cuban Government
"would complicate any attempt to return them to their original
owners".
(8) The international judicial
system, as currently structured, lacks fully effective remedies
for the wrongful confiscation of property and for unjust enrichment
from the use of wrongfully confiscated property by governments
and private entities at the expense of the rightful owners of
the property.
(9) International law recognizes
that a nation has the ability to provide for rules of law with
respect to conduct outside its territory that has or is intended
to have substantial effect within its territory.
(10) The United States Government
has an obligation to its citizens to provide protection against
wrongful confiscations by foreign nations and their citizens,
including the provision of private remedies.
(11) To defer trafficking
in wrongfully confiscated property, United States nationals
who were the victims of these confiscations should be endowed
with a judicial remedy in the courts of the United States that
would deny traffickers any profits from economically exploiting
Castro's wrongful seizures.
.......................................................................***
SEC. 302. LIABILITY FOR TRAFFICKING
IN CONFISCATED PROPERTY CLAIMED BY UNITED STATES NATIONALS
(22 USCA Sec. 6082)
.....(a)
CIVIL REMEDY.--
(1) LIABILITY FOR TRAFFICKING.--
(A) Except as otherwise provided
in this section, any person that, after the end of the
3-month period beginning on the effective date of this title,
traffics in property which was confiscated by the Cuban Government
on or after January 1, 1959, shall be liable to any United
States national who owns the claim to such property
for money damages in an amount equal to the sum of--
(i) the amount which is the greater
of--
(I) the amount, if any, certified
to the claimant by the Foreign Claims Settlement
Commission under the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, plus interest;
(II) the amount determined under
section 303(a)(2), plus interest; or
(III) the fair market value of that
property, calculated as being either the current value of the
property, or the value of the property when confiscated plus
interest, whichever is greater; and
...(ii)
court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.
(B) Interest under subparagraph
(A)(i) shall be at the rate set forth in section 1961 of title
28, United States Code, computed by the court from the date of
confiscation of the property involved to the date on which the
action is brought under this subsection.
(2) PRESUMPTION IN FAVOR OF THE CERTIFIED
CLAIMS.--There shall be a presumption that the amount
for which a person is liable under clause (i) of paragraph (1)(A)
is the amount that is certified as described in subclause (I)
of that clause. The presumption shall be rebuttable by clear
and convincing evidence that the amount described in subclause
(II) or (III) of that clause is the appropriate amount of liability
under that clause.
(3) INCREASED LIABILITY.--
.....(A)
Any person that traffics in confiscated property for which liability
is incurred under paragraph (1) shall, if a United States national
owns a claim with respect to that property which was certified
by the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission under title V of
the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, be liable for
damages computed in accordance with subparagraph (C).
.....(B)
If the claimant in an action under this subsection (other than
a United States national to whom subparagraph (A) applies) provides,
after the end of the 3-month period described in paragraph (1)
notice to--
(i) a person against whom the
action is to be initiated, or
(ii) a person who is to be joined
as a defendant in the action, at least 30 days before initiating
the ....action or joining such person
as a defendant, as the case may be, and that person, after the
end of .the 30-day period beginning
on the date the notice is provided, traffics in the confiscated
property.that is the subject of
the action, then that person shall
be liable to that claimant for damages computed in accordance
with subparagraph (C).
.....(C)
Damages for which a person is liable under subparagraph (A) or
subparagraph (B) are money damages in an amount equal to the
sum of--
(i) the amount determined under
paragraph (1)(A)(ii), and
(ii) 3 times the amount determined
applicable under paragraph (1)(A)(i).
.....(D)
Notice to a person under subparagraph (B)--
(i) shall be in writing;
(ii) shall be posted by certified
mail or personally delivered to the person; and
(iii) shall contain--
(I) a statement of intention
to commence the action under this section or to join the person ....as a defendant (as the case may
be), together with the reasons therefor;
(II) a demand that the unlawful
trafficking in the claimant's property cease immediately; .....and
(III) a copy of the summary statement
published under paragraph (8).
(4) APPLICABILITY.--
.....(A)
Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, actions may be
brought under paragraph (1) with respect to property confiscated
before, on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
.....(B)
In the case of property confiscated before the date of the enactment
of this Act, a United States national may not bring an action
under this section on a claim to the confiscated property unless
such national acquires ownership of the claim before such date
of enactment.
.....(C)
In the case of property confiscated on or after the date of the
enactment of this Act, a United States national who, after the
property is confiscated, acquires ownership of a claim to the
property by assignment for value, may not bring an action on
the claim under this section.
(5) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN ACTIONS.--
.....(A)
In the case of a United States national who was eligible to file
a claim with the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission under title
V of the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949 but did
not so file the claim, that United States national may not bring
an action on that claim under this section.
.....(B)
In the case of any action brought under this section by a United
States national whose underlying claim in the action was timely
filed with the Foreign Claims Settlement Commission under title
V of the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949 but was
denied by the Commission, the court shall accept the findings
of the Commission on the claim as conclusive in the action under
this section.
.....(C)
A United States national, other than a United States national
bringing an action under this section on a claim certified under
title V of the International Claims Settlement Act of 1949, may
not bring an action on a claim under this section before the
end of the 2-year period beginning on the date of the enactment
of this Act.
.....(D)
An interest in property for which a United States national has
a claim certified under title V of the International Claims Settlement
Act of 1949 may not be the subject of a claim in an action under
this section by any other person. Any person bringing an action
under this section whose claim has not been so certified shall
have the burden of establishing for the court that the interest
in property that is the subject of the claim is not the subject
of a claim so certified.
(6) INAPPLICABILITY OF ACT OF STATE
DOCTRINE.--
No court of the United States shall decline,
based upon the act of state doctrine, to make a
determination on the merits in an action brought under
paragraph (1).
(7) LICENSES NOT REQUIRED.--
.....(A)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action under this
section may be brought and may be settled, and a judgment rendered
in such action may be enforced, without obtaining any license
or other permission from any agency of the United States, except
that this paragraph shall not apply to the execution of a judgment
against, or the settlement of actions involving, property blocked
under the authorities of section 5(b) of the Trading with the
Enemy Act that were being exercised on July 1, 1977, as a result
of a national emergency declared by the President before such
date, and are being exercised on the date of the enactment of
this Act.
.....(B)
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and for purposes
of this title only, any claim against the Cuban Government shall
not be deemed to be an interest in property the transfer of which
to a United States national required before the enactment of
this Act, or requires after the enactment of this Act, a license
issued by, or the permission of, any agency of the United States.
.......................................................................***
.....(c) PROCEDURAL
REQUIREMENTS.--
..........(1)
IN GENERAL.--Except as provided in this title, the provisions
of title 28, United States Code, and the rules of the courts
of the United States apply to actions under this section to the
same extent as such provisions and rules apply to any other action
brought under section 1331 of title 28, United States Code.
..........(2)
SERVICE OF PROCESS.--In an action under this section,
service of process on an agency or instrumentality of a foreign
state in the conduct of a commercial activity, or against individuals
acting under color of law, shall be made in accordance with section
1608 of title 28, United States Code.
.....(d) ENFORCEABILITY
OF JUDGMENTS AGAINST CUBAN GOVERNMENT.--In an action brought
under this section, any judgment against an agency or instrumentality
of the Cuban Government shall not be enforceable against an
agency or instrumentality of either a transition government in
Cuba or a democratically elected government in Cuba.
.....(e)
CERTAIN PROPERTY IMMUNE FROM EXECUTION.--Section 1611
of title 28, United States Code [Foreign Sovereign Immunities
Act], is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
"(c) Notwithstanding the provisions of section 1610 of
this chapter, the property of a foreign state shall be immune
from attachment and from execution in an action brought under
section 302 of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity (LIBERTAD)
Act of 1996 to the extent that the property is a facility or
installation used by an accredited diplomatic mission for official
purposes." [i.e., foreign embassy in Havana located on such
confiscated property of a US citizen or corporation].
.............................................................................*** |