Social Action Alert

The Newsletter of the Social Justice Task Force of the Presbytery of Southern New England 

Number 4     —    January 2000

Commencement

We're becoming a committee of the Presbytery! At the February meeting of Presbytery, Council will present an amendment to the bylaws that will create a Social Justice Committee. The Presbytery will vote to approve or disapprove. We expect the amendment to be passed by a large majority. From our point of view, the overriding benefit is that social justice will become an established, programmatic priority.

As with any transition, there are some short-term consequences. The Task Force, which has enjoyed praying, working and acting with you, will not continue in office. This will most likely be the last issue of the Social Action Alert we prepare. More important, urgent matters may be neglected or delayed. The new committee will be nominated by the Nominating Committee and elected by presbytery. It will probably be organized after the May meeting of presbytery.

Before we turn our work over to the new committee, the Task Force wants to share some of its hopes and review a few of the issues we've already introduced. We all face many social justice issues. Your task force has presented some already. There are many others – from the Presbyterian Peacemaking Program, other General Assembly agencies, Synod and our newspapers. However we’re organized, Christians need to respond.
 


Children in Poverty

Children living in poverty is a national issue. In these most prosperous of times far too many children (and their families) are living below the official Federal poverty level. Many more people are living without adequate economic opportunity. There is an added tragedy about this reality. By and large poverty is no longer recognized as an urgent issue. The issue is becoming invisible.

As the richest state in the nation, Connecticut adds a particular twist to child poverty. Of the three states in this Presbytery, Connecticut has had the fastest growth in the numbers of its poor children. There are some recent encouraging signs. The tide, just possibly, has turned. The Connecticut legislature will be addressing this in its upcoming session (9 Feb - 3 May).

Resources: Two studies have just been released which we all should read:

Action recommendation: Let your legislators and the governor know this is important to you. Letters Count!
 

Gambling

People in all our congregations need to become increasingly aware of this issue. Many issues of social justice involve our witness to others. Gambling, and in particular gambling addiction, affects people in all walks of life – members of our churches, of our families as well as the strangers in our midst. Please make the time to review at least the denomination's resources.

Paul Gallant, of Sierra Tucson, spoke about gambling addiction to the commissioners at the November Presbytery meeting. Your responses to the questionnaire we distributed suggest this is an important issue. However, only six churches reported doing anything at all about it.

Resources: A slightly edited version of the study Gambling and the Christian Faith is available at: http://www.horeb.pcusa.org/gambling/images/gambling_and_the_christian_faith.htm
or in printed form, from Presbyterian Distribution Service as # 72-620-98-001. The March/April 1999 issue of Church & Society (PDS 72-630-99-602) is also devoted to this subject.
 


Domestic Violence

There is pain hidden in many families, including the “nicest!” If your congregation hasn't raised this issue, you will be helping some among your friends if you do. The Rev. Susan Pfeil, a Licensed (CT) Alcohol and Drug Counselor, (LADC) and Rev. John Ferguson are some of the trained resource people in this Presbytery.
 

Guns

This issue won't go away anytime soon. Whether you support the Presbyterian policy or not, we all recognize the need to reduce gun violence in this country.
 

The Unity Which Divides Us

by Ralph Jones

An Editorial

We all recognize there's a very large, very pink elephant in the midst of our communal living room. That elephant is not G-6.0106b in our Book of Order. It isn't even the theology of sin or the theology of hospitality, inclusiveness and fair treatment of all members (critical as those are).

In dealing with our elephant, we might remember John G. Saxe’s poem, The Blind Men and the Elephant. Our elephant, I submit, is our vain self-assurance that we know Jesus. Of course we do, but in Paul’s words, “only in part.” We all are seeking. We’re all on a pilgrimage toward knowing. Though some have traveled farther, none of us has arrived at the “then” of “face to face” knowledge. We need to take each other’s partial knowing seriously. “For in the one Spirit we were all baptized into one body…”

Some have said the issue is the interpretation of Scripture. Ralph Sundquist tells of participating in a national church committee some twenty years ago as it sought to address the church’s social policy. After hard work they gave up because they could not agree about the interpretation of scripture. Surely we are divided over how we read scripture, but our divisions are even more basic. Some have said it goes back to the Auburn controversy. It goes back even further.

What was the issue at the very first council, the one at Jerusalem? In part, it was whether people must receive the Law before they become Christians. If history teaches us that Paul won, surely the opposing case was strong. A Messiah is the answer to a problem of the Covenant. Just what can/does a Messiah mean to people who are not Yahweh’s people, who are not bound together by God's Covenant? In somewhat different terms the issue goes back even further, to the time of Moses. Was God's original chosen flock so dumb they didn’t remember their jewelry after Aaron made it into a golden calf/god? Perhaps what they demanded, while Moses was detained on the mountain, was a god who would be there in predictable ways. A god they could control. Are we so much brighter or more faithful? In all times God's people have struggled with what it means to be faithful, and how to correctly express faith.

No doubt some must be more correct than others about the present divisive issues. But how will God be served if we don't find a way to learn from each other, to listen to each other? Let's be sure our "Unity in our Diversity" conference is a healing time.

There are three options before us: win/win, lose/lose, compromise. If one side “wins,” as Achtemeier and Wheeler said, they will bear the guilt for rending the body of Christ. So both sides lose. However many people and property the ‘winners’ keep, and whether the ‘losers’ have the resources to become a new denomination or not, we will all be less a part of the body of Christ. I don't know how we get from where we are to a win/win situation. I know God's abundance can get us there. If we continue being two people – a house quite clearly divided – it is obvious we are both losing.

Compromise, far from being a dirty word, is the particularly Presbyterian opening for grace. In a compromise, none of us get what we think pure. None of us gets her or his way. When we vote, at presbytery, in session, congregation, committee or other governing activity, we often humanly feel we either win or lose. But that’s not the reformed understanding. What we get is God’s guidance, not the majority’s preference. Much as I dislike ‘b,’ its purpose may not be about exclusion so much as about teaching us all more about the nature of love and sin. It certainly has caused many of us to pray and reflect on the nature of God’s calling.

In compromise, we will get each other. We will have the gift of loving before us. We will be freed to do social justice, and to worship. As it is, we are spending all our efforts avoiding the elephant.

Godspeed!
 

Social ActionAlert is published by the Social Justice Task Force of the Presbytery of Southern New England on an as needed basis. It is sent to people who have indicated interest in advocating social justice in this Presbytery. Permission is granted to copy and edit contents as long as the intention of the original article is preserved and the Task Force is given proper credit. Material quoted or reproduced from other sources remains under the copyright of the original source.

Task Force members: 

James Bennett Ralph Sundquist
John Ferguson Susan Power Trucksess
Susan Pfeil Ralph Jones, Secretary and Editor

 
PSNE Home
Social Action Alert Index